Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/alienating-audiences-from-innovation-the-perils-of-polemics-ideology-5Xb0bDy8SI
References (24)
-
Rand Rand, Rand Rand, Kopetski Kopetski (2005)
The spectrum of parental alienation syndrome (Part III): The Kopetski follow‐up studyAmerican Journal of Forensic Psychology, 23
-
J. Kelly (2010)
COMMENTARY ON “FAMILY BRIDGES: USING INSIGHTS FROM SOCIAL SCIENCE TO RECONNECT PARENTS AND ALIENATED CHILDREN” (WARSHAK, 2010)Family Court Review, 48
-
Warshak Warshak (2002b)
Misdiagnosis of parental alienation syndromeAmerican Journal of Forensic Psychology, 20
-
M. Sullivan, Peggie Ward, R. Deutsch (2010)
OVERCOMING BARRIERS FAMILY CAMP:A PROGRAM FOR HIGH‐CONFLICT DIVORCED FAMILIES WHERE A CHILD1 IS RESISTING CONTACT WITH A PARENTFamily Court Review, 48
-
Greenberg Greenberg, Gould Gould, Gould‐Saltman Gould‐Saltman, Stahl Stahl (2003)
Is the child's therapist part of the problem?Family Law Quarterly, 37
-
J. Dunne, M. Hedrick (1994)
The parental alienation syndrome: An analysis of sixteen selected cases.Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 21
-
B. Fidler, N. Bala (2010)
CHILDREN RESISTING POSTSEPARATION CONTACT WITH A PARENT: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES, AND CONUNDRUMSFamily Court Review, 48
-
R. Warshak (2005)
Blanket restrictions: Overnight contact between parents and young children.Family Court Review, 38
-
M. Lamb, K. Sternberg, Ross Thompson (1997)
The effects of divorce and custody arrangements on children's behaviour, development and adjustmentExpert Evidence, 5
-
R. Warshak (2007)
The Approximation Rule, Child Development Research, and Children’s Best Interests After DivorceChild Development Perspectives, 1
-
Rosnow Rosnow (1991)
Inside rumorAmerican Psychologist, 46
-
Levitt Levitt (2005)
Social relations in childhood and adolescenceHuman Development, 48
-
R. Rosnow (1991)
Inside rumor: A personal journey.American Psychologist, 46
-
M. Rutter (1995)
Clinical implications of attachment concepts: retrospect and prospect.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 36 4
-
M. Levitt (2005)
Social Relations in Childhood and Adolescence: The Convoy Model PerspectiveHuman Development, 48
-
R. Warshak (2010)
FAMILY BRIDGES: USING INSIGHTS FROM SOCIAL SCIENCE TO RECONNECT PARENTS AND ALIENATED CHILDREN*Family Court Review, 48
-
B. Barber (1996)
Parental psychological control: revisiting a neglected construct.Child development, 67 6
-
R. Warshak, Mark Otis (2010)
HELPING ALIENATED CHILDREN WITH FAMILY BRIDGES: PRACTICE, RESEARCH, AND THE PURSUIT OF “HUMBITION”Family Court Review, 48
-
D. Rand (1997)
THE SPECTRUM OF PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME (PART II) -
Lamb Lamb, Sternberg Sternberg, Thompson Thompson (1997)
The effects of divorce and custody arrangements on children's behavior, development, and adjustmentFamily and Conciliation Courts Review, 35
-
Rutter Rutter (1995a)
Clinical implications of attachment conceptsJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36
-
J. Johnston (2007)
INTRODUCING PERSPECTIVES IN FAMILY LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCHFamily Court Review, 45
-
R. Rosnow, Eric Foster, R. Rosnow, R. Rosenthal, W. Freeman, D. Rubin, E. Foster (2005)
Rumor and Gossip Research -
R. Gardner (2001)
SHOULD COURTS ORDER PAS CHILDREN TO VISIT/RESIDE WITH THE ALIENATED PARENT? A Follow-up Study
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © 2010 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts
- ISSN
- 1531-2445
- eISSN
- 1744-1617
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01295.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
When judging innovative programs like Family Bridges™, it is important to balance careful scrutiny with openness to new ideas. Judicial responses to children who reject a parent are best governed by a multifactor individualized approach. A presumption that allows children and one parent to regulate the other parent's access to the children is unsupported by research. A custody decision based solely on the severity of alienation leaves children vulnerable to intensification of efforts to poison their affections toward a parent. Concern with possible short‐term distress for some children who are required to repair a damaged relationship should not blind us to the long‐term trauma of doing nothing. Professionals are urged to minimize the infusion of polemics, rigid ideology, and rumors when offering opinions with inadequate information, particularly public statements that risk harming children.
Journal
Family Court Review – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2010