Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Administrative roles of department chairmen

Administrative roles of department chairmen The paucity of empirical or conceptual knowledge about the organization and administration of postsecondary institutions was noted by Henderson (1963) and McConnell (1963) more than a decade ago. This lack of scientific curiosity has been documented indirectly by the omission of postsecondary institutions from the comprehensive summary of organizational research edited by March (1965). More recent assessments of research findings in this field clearly suggest that little progress has been realized in the intervening years. Reviews and critiques of research evidence on how colleges and universities are structured and operated indicate that this lack of progress has been due primarily to the tendency of researchers to base their inquiries on common sense and pragmatic criteria and their failure to employ empirical approaches to develop or test theoretical models (Corwin, 1974; Peterson, 1974; Richman and Farmer, 1974). The dearth of organizational knowledge about postsecondary institutions has repeatedly been attributed to the absence of appro- priate conceptual models to guide substantive inquiries (Cohen and March, 1974; Gross and Grambsch, 1974). Studies based on the bureaucratic (Page, 1951; Stroup, 1966), COllegid O human relar tions (Goodman, 1962; Millett, 1962), and political (Baldridge, 1971) models have failed to gain general acceptance, since http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png New Directions for Institutional Research Wiley

Administrative roles of department chairmen

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/administrative-roles-of-department-chairmen-x0PFaaZOVz
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0271-0579
eISSN
1536-075X
DOI
10.1002/ir.37019761005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The paucity of empirical or conceptual knowledge about the organization and administration of postsecondary institutions was noted by Henderson (1963) and McConnell (1963) more than a decade ago. This lack of scientific curiosity has been documented indirectly by the omission of postsecondary institutions from the comprehensive summary of organizational research edited by March (1965). More recent assessments of research findings in this field clearly suggest that little progress has been realized in the intervening years. Reviews and critiques of research evidence on how colleges and universities are structured and operated indicate that this lack of progress has been due primarily to the tendency of researchers to base their inquiries on common sense and pragmatic criteria and their failure to employ empirical approaches to develop or test theoretical models (Corwin, 1974; Peterson, 1974; Richman and Farmer, 1974). The dearth of organizational knowledge about postsecondary institutions has repeatedly been attributed to the absence of appro- priate conceptual models to guide substantive inquiries (Cohen and March, 1974; Gross and Grambsch, 1974). Studies based on the bureaucratic (Page, 1951; Stroup, 1966), COllegid O human relar tions (Goodman, 1962; Millett, 1962), and political (Baldridge, 1971) models have failed to gain general acceptance, since

Journal

New Directions for Institutional ResearchWiley

Published: Jun 1, 1976

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month