Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation

A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation A model of knowledge management is developed. It builds on the interplay between articulated and tacit knowledge at four different levels: the individual, the small group, the organization, and the interorganizational domain. The model is applied on differences between Western and Japanese patterns of knowledge management. These are related to organizational characteristics, such as employment systems, career patterns, and organization structure. Effective knowledge management is argued to require departures from the logic of hierarchical organization and the M‐form structure. The alternative N‐form is characterized and suggested as more appropriate. It entails combination of knowledge rather than its division, which is the basic principle in the M‐form. Other attributes of the N‐form are: temporary constellations of people, the importance of personnel at ‘lower levels’, lateral communication, a catalytic and architectural role for top management, strategies aimed at focusing and economies of depth, and heterarchical structures. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Strategic Management Journal Wiley

A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation

Strategic Management Journal , Volume 15 (S2) – Jun 1, 1994

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/a-model-of-knowledge-management-and-the-n-form-corporation-adFXZoVYno

References (88)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN
0143-2095
eISSN
1097-0266
DOI
10.1002/smj.4250151006
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A model of knowledge management is developed. It builds on the interplay between articulated and tacit knowledge at four different levels: the individual, the small group, the organization, and the interorganizational domain. The model is applied on differences between Western and Japanese patterns of knowledge management. These are related to organizational characteristics, such as employment systems, career patterns, and organization structure. Effective knowledge management is argued to require departures from the logic of hierarchical organization and the M‐form structure. The alternative N‐form is characterized and suggested as more appropriate. It entails combination of knowledge rather than its division, which is the basic principle in the M‐form. Other attributes of the N‐form are: temporary constellations of people, the importance of personnel at ‘lower levels’, lateral communication, a catalytic and architectural role for top management, strategies aimed at focusing and economies of depth, and heterarchical structures.

Journal

Strategic Management JournalWiley

Published: Jun 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.