Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The Institutionalization of "microbuses" as the mainstay of Lima's transit system is used as a case to illustrate how informal institutions evolve in Peru through a dialectic between popular and dominant sectors, each employing a distinctive style of planning: "generative planning" for the popular sectors and "regulative planning" for the dominant sectors. The two planning styles are described paradigmatically. Though generative planning is common among the popular sectors, the dominant sectors employ it in their own informal institutions and private affairs—and where the government lacks coercive force, its regulations are implemented informally in ways that resemble the generative planning of the popular sectors, (informal sector, urban planning, political economy, public transportation, Peru)
City & Society – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 1987
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.