A Cross‐Modal Comparison of Telephone and Face‐to‐Face Selection Interviews in Graduate Recruitment

A Cross‐Modal Comparison of Telephone and Face‐to‐Face Selection Interviews in Graduate... Although there has been an increase in the use of telephone interviews for graduate recruitment by companies in the UK, there is little evidence attesting to their equivalence with traditional face‐to‐face selection interviews. A total of 70 candidates applying to a multinational oil corporation received both face‐to‐face and telephone interviews as the first stage of the 1996 graduate recruitment milkround. Group A (N = 41) received an initial face‐to‐face interview followed by a telephone interview and group B (N = 29) a telephone interview followed by a face‐to‐face interview. Findings indicate that candidates received significantly lower ratings when interviewed by telephone than when interviewed face‐to‐face (p ≤ 0.001). A significant interaction was also found (p ≤ 0.05) with candidates who received face‐to‐face interviews following telephone interviews demonstrating improved performance in their face‐to‐face interviews. The practical implications of these findings for companies wishing to use telephone interviews are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Selection and Assessment Wiley

A Cross‐Modal Comparison of Telephone and Face‐to‐Face Selection Interviews in Graduate Recruitment

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/a-cross-modal-comparison-of-telephone-and-face-to-face-selection-dDxCOHo6n7
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0965-075X
eISSN
1468-2389
DOI
10.1111/1468-2389.00127
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Although there has been an increase in the use of telephone interviews for graduate recruitment by companies in the UK, there is little evidence attesting to their equivalence with traditional face‐to‐face selection interviews. A total of 70 candidates applying to a multinational oil corporation received both face‐to‐face and telephone interviews as the first stage of the 1996 graduate recruitment milkround. Group A (N = 41) received an initial face‐to‐face interview followed by a telephone interview and group B (N = 29) a telephone interview followed by a face‐to‐face interview. Findings indicate that candidates received significantly lower ratings when interviewed by telephone than when interviewed face‐to‐face (p ≤ 0.001). A significant interaction was also found (p ≤ 0.05) with candidates who received face‐to‐face interviews following telephone interviews demonstrating improved performance in their face‐to‐face interviews. The practical implications of these findings for companies wishing to use telephone interviews are discussed.

Journal

International Journal of Selection and AssessmentWiley

Published: Mar 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month