A comparison of a rising‐plate meter and an electronic capacitance meter for estimating the yield of pastures grazed by dairy cows

A comparison of a rising‐plate meter and an electronic capacitance meter for estimating the... The performances of a rising‐plate meter and a single‐probe electronic capacitance meter were compared for estimating the herbage mass of irrigated pastures both before and after grazing by dairy cows. Mean CV for the rising plate meter and the single‐probe meter were 12.7% and 13.3% respectively when herbage mass was measured before grazing, and 21.8% and 15.4% respectively immediately after grazing. These coefficients of variation indicate that while the performance of the two meters was similar when herbage mass was measured before grazing, the single‐probe meter was a more precise instrument for estimating herbage mass after grazing. Trampling of herbage prior to measurement had a major effect on the regressions of both meters; the regression intercept was increased by 2800 kg dry matter (DM) ha−1 for the rising‐plate meter and by 2580 kg DM ha−1 for the single‐probe meter. The slopes of the graphs, however, remained unchanged. It was concluded that while the single‐probe meter performed better than the rising‐plate meter for estimating the mass of post‐grazing herbage when trampling was negligible, the large effect that trampling had on the post‐grazing calibration regressions precluded both instruments from general use in dairy cattle research. This indicates that another technique is required in circumstances in which pastures are heavily trampled. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Grass & Forage Science Wiley

A comparison of a rising‐plate meter and an electronic capacitance meter for estimating the yield of pastures grazed by dairy cows

Grass & Forage Science, Volume 39 (4) – Dec 1, 1984

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/a-comparison-of-a-rising-plate-meter-and-an-electronic-capacitance-JJCGJwz7NJ
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0142-5242
eISSN
1365-2494
D.O.I.
10.1111/j.1365-2494.1984.tb01711.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The performances of a rising‐plate meter and a single‐probe electronic capacitance meter were compared for estimating the herbage mass of irrigated pastures both before and after grazing by dairy cows. Mean CV for the rising plate meter and the single‐probe meter were 12.7% and 13.3% respectively when herbage mass was measured before grazing, and 21.8% and 15.4% respectively immediately after grazing. These coefficients of variation indicate that while the performance of the two meters was similar when herbage mass was measured before grazing, the single‐probe meter was a more precise instrument for estimating herbage mass after grazing. Trampling of herbage prior to measurement had a major effect on the regressions of both meters; the regression intercept was increased by 2800 kg dry matter (DM) ha−1 for the rising‐plate meter and by 2580 kg DM ha−1 for the single‐probe meter. The slopes of the graphs, however, remained unchanged. It was concluded that while the single‐probe meter performed better than the rising‐plate meter for estimating the mass of post‐grazing herbage when trampling was negligible, the large effect that trampling had on the post‐grazing calibration regressions precluded both instruments from general use in dairy cattle research. This indicates that another technique is required in circumstances in which pastures are heavily trampled.

Journal

Grass & Forage ScienceWiley

Published: Dec 1, 1984

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off