Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/a-case-study-to-demonstrate-a-pareto-frontier-for-selecting-a-best-q18MPa9xzK
References (35)
-
Jeffrey Horn, Nicholas Nafpliotis, D. Goldberg (1994)
A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimizationProceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence
-
R. Cook, Christopher Nachtrheim (1980)
A Comparison of Algorithms for Constructing Exact D-Optimal DesignsTechnometrics, 22
-
C. Anderson‐Cook, C. Borror, B. Jones (2009)
Graphical Tools for Assessing the Sensitivity of Response Surface Designs to Model MisspecificationTechnometrics, 51
-
J. Cornell (1982)
Experiments with Mixtures: Designs, Models and the Analysis of Mixture Data -
Lu Lu, C. Anderson‐Cook, T. Robinson (2011)
Optimization of Designed Experiments Based on Multiple Criteria Utilizing a Pareto FrontierTechnometrics, 53
-
H. Trautmann, J. Mehnen (2009)
Preference-based Pareto optimization in certain and noisy environmentsEngineering Optimization, 41
-
S. Kirkpatrick, C. Gelatt, Mario Vecchi (1983)
Optimization by Simulated AnnealingScience, 220
-
T. Robinson, C. Anderson‐Cook (2010)
A Closer Look at D-Optimality for Screening DesignsQuality Engineering, 23
-
Anderson‐Cook Anderson‐Cook (2010)
Statistics Roundtable: A Matter of Trust: Balance Confidence in your Model while Avoiding PitfallsQuality Progress
-
P. Ngatchou, Anahita Zarei, Mohamed El-Sharkawi (2005)
Pareto Multi Objective OptimizationProceedings of the 13th International Conference on, Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems
-
B. Jones, William Li, C. Nachtsheim, Kenny Ye (2009)
Model-robust supersaturated and partially supersaturated designsJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139
-
Dizza Bursztyn, D. Steinberg (2006)
Comparison of designs for computer experimentsJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136
-
B. Jones, William Li, C. Nachtsheim, Kenny Ye (2007)
Model discrimination—another perspective on model-robust designsJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137
-
E. Castillo, D. Montgomery (1993)
A Nonlinear Programming Solution to the Dual Response ProblemJournal of Quality Technology, 25
-
Carlyle Carlyle, Montgomery Montgomery, Runger Runger (2000)
Optimization Problems and Methods in Quality Control and Improvement (with discussion)Journal of Quality Technology, 31
-
W. Gronwald, T. Hohm, D. Hoffmann (2008)
Evolutionary Pareto-optimization of stably folding peptidesBMC Bioinformatics, 9
-
Edward Kasprzak, K. Lewis (2001)
Pareto analysis in multiobjective optimization using the collinearity theorem and scaling methodStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 22
-
G. Derringer, R. Suich (1980)
Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response VariablesJournal of Quality Technology, 12
-
N. Srinivas, K. Deb (1994)
Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic AlgorithmsEvolutionary Computation, 2
-
R. Cook, C. Nachtsheim (1982)
Model Robust, Linear-Optimal DesignsTechnometrics, 24
-
R. Bates, Ron Kenett, D. Steinberg, H. Wynn (2006)
Achieving Robust Design from Computer SimulationsQuality Technology & Quantitative Management, 3
-
Harrington Harrington (1965)
The Desirability FunctionIndustrial Quality Control, 21
-
R. Marler, J. Arora (2004)
Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineeringStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26
-
Nam-Ky Nguyen, Alan Miller (1992)
A review of some exchange algorithms for constructing discrete D-optimal designsComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 14
-
E. Zitzler, L. Thiele (1998)
An evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: the strength Pareto approach, 43
-
E. Läuter (1974)
Experimental design in a class of modelsStatistics, 5
-
Lu Lu, Anderson‐Cook Anderson‐Cook (2012)
Rethinking the Optimal Response Surface Design for a First‐Order Model with Two‐Factor Interactions, when Protecting against CurvatureQuality Engineering, 3
-
N. Draper, I. Guttman (1992)
Treating bias as variance for experimental design purposesAnnals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 44
-
B. Jones, C. Nachtsheim (2011)
Efficient Designs With Minimal AliasingTechnometrics, 53
-
J. Holland (1975)
Adaptation in natural and artificial systems -
G. Box, Patrick Liu (1999)
Statistics as a Catalyst to Learning by Scientific Method Part I—An ExampleJournal of Quality Technology, 31
-
W. Carlyle, D. Montgomery, G. Runger (2000)
Optimization Problems and Methods in Quality Control and ImprovementJournal of Quality Technology, 32
-
G. Box, N. Draper (1959)
A Basis for the Selection of a Response Surface DesignJournal of the American Statistical Association, 54
-
Srinivas Srinivas, Deb Deb (1994)
Multiobjective Function Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting Genetic AlgorithmsEvolutionary computation, 2
-
C. Fonseca, P. Fleming (1993)
Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: FormulationDiscussion and Generalization
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- ISSN
- 1524-1904
- eISSN
- 1526-4025
- DOI
- 10.1002/asmb.940
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Experimenting with limited resources often means that we are trying to get more out of a single experiment and balance competing goals. Selecting a best response surface design when simultaneously optimizing multiple criteria requires carefully choosing measures and scales of different design criteria and then balancing the trade‐offs between the criteria. This paper illustrates a decision‐making process using a Pareto frontier to identify good design candidates and a Utopia point approach for selection of an optimal design based on several competing criteria. The Pareto approach shows substantial improvement over the classic desirability function method by offering the user greater flexibility in quantifying the robustness of designs to weight specifications and the sensitivity of the solutions to different choices of weights, scales, and metrics. Graphical methods are used for summarizing and extracting useful information for improved decision‐making. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Journal
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2012