24‐hour aortic blood pressure variability showed a stronger association with carotid damage than 24‐hour brachial blood pressure variability: The SAFAR study

24‐hour aortic blood pressure variability showed a stronger association with carotid damage... We aim to compare 24‐hour aortic blood pressure variability (BPV) with brachial BPV in relation to carotid damage as estimated by carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) and cross‐sectional area (CCSA). Four hundred and forty five individuals received brachial and aortic 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring with a validated device (Mobil‐O‐Graph). Systolic BPV was estimated by average real variability (ARV) and time‐weighted standard deviation (wSD). In multiple logistic regression analysis, CIMT > 900 μm was significantly and independently associated with aortic ARV (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04‐1.84), aortic wSD (OR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.19‐2.29) and brachial ARV (OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07‐2.18), but not with brachial wSD. CCSA > 90th percentile was significantly and independently associated with aortic ARV (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.07‐2.10) and wSD (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.12‐2.56), but not with brachial BPVs. In receiver operator characteristics curve analysis, aortic wSD identified CCSA > 90th percentile better than brachial wSD (AUC: 0.73 vs 0.68, P < .01). In conclusion, aortic 24‐hour systolic BPV showed a slightly stronger association with carotid damage than brachial BPV. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Clinical Hypertension Wiley

24‐hour aortic blood pressure variability showed a stronger association with carotid damage than 24‐hour brachial blood pressure variability: The SAFAR study

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/24-hour-aortic-blood-pressure-variability-showed-a-stronger-UMW8NtgM5I
Publisher
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN
1524-6175
eISSN
1751-7176
D.O.I.
10.1111/jch.13226
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We aim to compare 24‐hour aortic blood pressure variability (BPV) with brachial BPV in relation to carotid damage as estimated by carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) and cross‐sectional area (CCSA). Four hundred and forty five individuals received brachial and aortic 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring with a validated device (Mobil‐O‐Graph). Systolic BPV was estimated by average real variability (ARV) and time‐weighted standard deviation (wSD). In multiple logistic regression analysis, CIMT > 900 μm was significantly and independently associated with aortic ARV (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04‐1.84), aortic wSD (OR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.19‐2.29) and brachial ARV (OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07‐2.18), but not with brachial wSD. CCSA > 90th percentile was significantly and independently associated with aortic ARV (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.07‐2.10) and wSD (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.12‐2.56), but not with brachial BPVs. In receiver operator characteristics curve analysis, aortic wSD identified CCSA > 90th percentile better than brachial wSD (AUC: 0.73 vs 0.68, P < .01). In conclusion, aortic 24‐hour systolic BPV showed a slightly stronger association with carotid damage than brachial BPV.

Journal

Journal of Clinical HypertensionWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

Keywords: ; ; ;

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial