D. Fanelli (2010)
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the SciencesPLoS ONE, 5
A. O'hear (1989)
Introduction to the Philosophy of Science
(2015)
Detectability and the evaluation of replication results
R. Klein, Kate Ratliff, M. Vianello, Reginald Adams, Š. Bahník, M. Bernstein, K. Bocian, M. Brandt, B. Brooks, C. Brumbaugh, Z. Cemalcılar, Jesse Chandler, Winnee Cheong, W. Davis, T. Devos, M. Eisner, Natalia Frankowska, D. Furrow, E. Galliani, F. Hasselman, Joshua Hicks, James Hovermale, S. Hunt, Jeffrey Huntsinger, H. Ijzerman, Melissa-Sue John, Jennifer Joy-Gaba, H. Kappes, Lacy Krueger, Jaime Kurtz, C. Levitan, Robyn Mallett, Wendy Morris, A. Nelson, J. Nier, Grant Packard, Ronaldo Pilati, Abraham Rutchick, Kathleen Schmidt, Jeanine Skorinko, Robert Smith, Troy Steiner, Justin Storbeck, Lyn Swol, Donna Thompson, A. Veer, L. Vaughn, M. Vranka, A. Wichman, Julie Woodzicka, Brian Nosek (2022)
Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication ProjectSocial Psychology, 45
(1997)
A different perspective
Timothy Errington, E. Iorns, W. Gunn, F. Tan, Joelle Lomax, Brian Nosek (2014)
An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology researcheLife, 3
92 Department of Psychology NC 27109, USA. 93 Counseling and Psychological Services
24 Mark Roebke
16 Mathijs van de Ven, 17 Don van den Bergh, 16 Marije van der Hulst
F. Prinz, T. Schlange, K. Asadullah (2011)
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10
C. Begley, Lee Ellis (2012)
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
S. Hewitt (2016)
ReproducibilityJournal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 64
This article cites 37 articles, 3 of which you can access for free
R. Fisher (1925)
Theory of Statistical EstimationMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 22
30 Nathali Immelman, 72 Vanessa C. Irsik
Netherlands. 115 Department of Behavioral Sciences, Ariel University Ariel, 40700 Israel. 116
Brian Nosek, Jeffrey Spies, Michael Cohn, E. Bartmess, D. Lakens, Denise Holman, J. Cohoon, Melissa Lewis, S. Gordon-McKeon, H. Ijzerman (2012)
Open Science Collaboration
40 Stefan Stieger, 82 Nina Strohminger
C. Hempel (1968)
Maximal Specificity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic ExplanationPhilosophy of Science, 35
Mark Verschoor, 20 Michelangelo Vianello, 59 Martin Voracek
81 Franziska Maria Kolorz
P. Meehl (1990)
Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant ItPsychological Inquiry, 1
Robert McArthur (2013)
Faculty Opinions recommendation of Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.
(2014)
Editors ’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science : A crisis of confidence ?
16 Annick Bosch, 17 Frank A
A. Greenwald (1975)
Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null HypothesisPsychological Bulletin, 82
T. Broadbent, I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave (1972)
Criticism and the Growth of KnowledgeThe Mathematical Gazette, 56
J. Platt (1964)
Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others.Science, 146 3642
L. John, G. Loewenstein, D. Prelec (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth TellingPsychological Science, 23
16 Hedderik van Rijn, 114 Wolf Vanpaemel, 40 Alejandro Vásquez Echeverría
Aamir Laique, 83 Daniël Lakens
John Ioannidis (2005)
Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2
Yang Wei-we (2008)
A Review on
50 Anna Fedor, 51 Belén Fernández-Castilla
S. Braver, F. Thoemmes, R. Rosenthal (2014)
Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and ReplicabilityPerspectives on Psychological Science, 9
36 Department of Psychology
T. Sterling (1959)
Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice VersaJournal of the American Statistical Association, 54
(2012)
A crisis of confidence? Perspect
29 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. 30 Department of Psychology
Brian Nosek, D. Lakens (2014)
Registered Reports A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published ResultsSocial Psychology, 45
Paul Rozin (2009)
What Kind of Empirical Research Should We Publish, Fund, and Reward?: A Different PerspectivePerspectives on Psychological Science, 4
(1947)
Frank J. Farach
(1959)
J. Am. Stat. Assoc
67 Jeremy Gray, 29 Chris Hartgerink
AND NOTES
Friday Schedule, Saturday Schedule, Sunday Schedule, T. Book, Signings Blog, App Twitter, Jonah Lehrer (2017)
The Truth Wears Off Is there something wrong with the scientific method ?
G. Howard, M. Lau, S. Maxwell, André Venter, Rae Lundy, Ryan Sweeny (2009)
Do Research Literatures Give Correct Answers?Review of General Psychology, 13
Brian Nosek, D. Lakens (2012)
An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological SciencePerspectives on Psychological Science, 7
56 Gea Hoogendoorn
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada. 9 Department of Psychology II
W. Viechtbauer (2010)
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor PackageJournal of Statistical Software, 36
B. Nosek, Jeffrey Spies, Matt Motyl (2012)
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishabilityarXiv: Physics and Society
H. Beek (2012)
F1000Prime recommendation of False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.
D. Lakens (2013)
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAsFrontiers in Psychology, 4
S. Schmidt (2009)
Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social SciencesReview of General Psychology, 13
J. Ioannidis, M. Munafo, P. Fusar-Poli, Brian Nosek, S. David (2014)
Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and preventionTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 18
OH 45435, USA. 109 California State University, Northridge, Northridge, CA 91330, USA. 110 Kutztown University of Pennsylvania
K. Button, J. Ioannidis, C. Mokrysz, Brian Nosek, J. Flint, E. Robinson, M. Munafo (2013)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscienceNature Reviews Neuroscience, 14
Joshua Hartshorne, Adena Schachner (2011)
Tracking Replicability as a Method of Post-Publication Open EvaluationFrontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6
C. Hempel, P. Oppenheim (1948)
Studies in the Logic of ExplanationPhilosophy of Science, 15
USA. 63 Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology
C. Begley, Lee Ellis (2012)
Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer researchNature, 483
Jacob Cohen (1962)
The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review.Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 65
R. Rosenthal (1979)
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null resultsPsychological Bulletin, 86
74 Institute for Multimedia and Interactive Systems
Brian Nosek, G. Alter, G. Banks, D. Borsboom, S. Bowman, S. Breckler, S. Buck, C. Chambers, G. Chin, G. Christensen, M. Contestabile, A. Dafoe, E. Eich, J. Freese, R. Glennerster, D. Goroff, D. Green, B. Hesse, M. Humphreys, J. Ishiyama, D. Karlan, A. Kraut, A. Lupia, P. Mabry, T. Madon, N. Malhotra, E. Mayo-Wilson, M. McNutt, E. Miguel, E. Paluck, U. Simonsohn, C. Soderberg, B. Spellman, J. Turitto, G. VandenBos, S. Vazire, E. Wagenmakers, R. Wilson, T. Yarkoni (2015)
Promoting an open research cultureScience, 348
Science – Unpaywall
Published: Aug 28, 2015
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.