Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

When is the Local Average Treatment Close to the Average?: Evidence from Fertility and Labor Supply

When is the Local Average Treatment Close to the Average?: Evidence from Fertility and Labor Supply Abstract: The local average treatment effect (LATE) may differ from the average treatment effect (ATE) when those influenced by the instrument are not representative of the overall population. Heterogeneity in treatment effects may imply that parameter estimates from 2SLS are uninformative regarding the average treatment effect, motivating a search for instruments that affect a larger share of the population. In this paper, I present and estimate a model of home production with heterogeneous costs and benefits to fertility. The results indicate that a sex-preference instrument in Taiwan produces IV estimates closer to the estimated ATE than in the United States, where sex preference is weaker. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Human Resources University of Wisconsin Press

When is the Local Average Treatment Close to the Average?: Evidence from Fertility and Labor Supply

Journal of Human Resources , Volume 44 (4) – Apr 4, 2009

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-wisconsin-press/when-is-the-local-average-treatment-close-to-the-average-evidence-from-IYN0JgbeB1

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of Wisconsin Press
Copyright
Copyright © University of Wisconsin Press
ISSN
1548-8004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract: The local average treatment effect (LATE) may differ from the average treatment effect (ATE) when those influenced by the instrument are not representative of the overall population. Heterogeneity in treatment effects may imply that parameter estimates from 2SLS are uninformative regarding the average treatment effect, motivating a search for instruments that affect a larger share of the population. In this paper, I present and estimate a model of home production with heterogeneous costs and benefits to fertility. The results indicate that a sex-preference instrument in Taiwan produces IV estimates closer to the estimated ATE than in the United States, where sex preference is weaker.

Journal

Journal of Human ResourcesUniversity of Wisconsin Press

Published: Apr 4, 2009

There are no references for this article.