Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Art of Observing the Small: On the Borders of the subvisibilia (from Hooke to Brockes)

The Art of Observing the Small: On the Borders of the subvisibilia (from Hooke to Brockes) Abstract: The invention of the microscope and its adoption into widespread use from the mid-seventeenth century on affected the way natural philosophers and writers thought about observation. But instead of retracing the microscope’s enhancement of the visible, this essay explores how, under the impact of the microscope, the relationship between knowledge and the visible is repeatedly renegotiated and displaced in natural philosophy and poetry. Robert Hooke’s ethos of observation limits knowledge to the realm of the visible; Leibniz reintroduces the invisible into knowledge while setting new limits between human and divine knowledge; Brockes develops new figures of limitlessness. These and other examples show how the look through the microscope could lead to divergent and even contradictory epistemic consequences. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Monatshefte University of Wisconsin Press

The Art of Observing the Small: On the Borders of the subvisibilia (from Hooke to Brockes)

Monatshefte , Volume 105 (3) – Nov 8, 2013

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-wisconsin-press/the-art-of-observing-the-small-on-the-borders-of-the-subvisibilia-from-Xm2oZKqhYt
Publisher
University of Wisconsin Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 The Board of Regents of The University of Wisconsin System.
ISSN
1934-2810
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract: The invention of the microscope and its adoption into widespread use from the mid-seventeenth century on affected the way natural philosophers and writers thought about observation. But instead of retracing the microscope’s enhancement of the visible, this essay explores how, under the impact of the microscope, the relationship between knowledge and the visible is repeatedly renegotiated and displaced in natural philosophy and poetry. Robert Hooke’s ethos of observation limits knowledge to the realm of the visible; Leibniz reintroduces the invisible into knowledge while setting new limits between human and divine knowledge; Brockes develops new figures of limitlessness. These and other examples show how the look through the microscope could lead to divergent and even contradictory epistemic consequences.

Journal

MonatshefteUniversity of Wisconsin Press

Published: Nov 8, 2013

There are no references for this article.