Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Tamarisk Removal in Grand Canyon National Park: Changing the Native–Non-native Relationship as a Restoration Goal

Tamarisk Removal in Grand Canyon National Park: Changing the Native–Non-native Relationship as... The removal of non-native species is often an important restoration goal in natural areas, including national parks. There is often a positive correlation between non-native and native plant species richness, so that areas with the greatest number of native species support the greatest number of non-natives. This pattern may create both challenges and opportunities for restoration. Native species may be inadvertently damaged or killed during mechanical or chemical treatments targeted toward non-natives. However, greater numbers of native species may better colonize subsequent openings. We used data from an ongoing active management project in Grand Canyon National Park to test three predictions of plant community response to invasive tamarisk (<i>Tamarix</i> spp.) removal. We investigated patterns of native and non-native species abundance and richness, compositional shifts, and the relationship between native and non-native species before and after treatments. In general, native species richness and abundance did not increase, but species composition following tamarisk removal tended to become more similar to that in uninvaded stands. Native and non-native species richness and abundance were positively correlated before tamarisk removal. While treatment successfully reduced cover of tamarisk after one to three years, our results suggest that it may not increase richness of native species during the same period. Furthermore, investigating native and non-native species relationships may be a useful tool for exploring hypotheses and consequences of restoration via invasive species removal. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecological Restoration University of Wisconsin Press

Tamarisk Removal in Grand Canyon National Park: Changing the Native–Non-native Relationship as a Restoration Goal

Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-wisconsin-press/tamarisk-removal-in-grand-canyon-national-park-changing-the-native-non-Idyswnt6IF

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of Wisconsin Press
ISSN
1543-4079

Abstract

The removal of non-native species is often an important restoration goal in natural areas, including national parks. There is often a positive correlation between non-native and native plant species richness, so that areas with the greatest number of native species support the greatest number of non-natives. This pattern may create both challenges and opportunities for restoration. Native species may be inadvertently damaged or killed during mechanical or chemical treatments targeted toward non-natives. However, greater numbers of native species may better colonize subsequent openings. We used data from an ongoing active management project in Grand Canyon National Park to test three predictions of plant community response to invasive tamarisk (<i>Tamarix</i> spp.) removal. We investigated patterns of native and non-native species abundance and richness, compositional shifts, and the relationship between native and non-native species before and after treatments. In general, native species richness and abundance did not increase, but species composition following tamarisk removal tended to become more similar to that in uninvaded stands. Native and non-native species richness and abundance were positively correlated before tamarisk removal. While treatment successfully reduced cover of tamarisk after one to three years, our results suggest that it may not increase richness of native species during the same period. Furthermore, investigating native and non-native species relationships may be a useful tool for exploring hypotheses and consequences of restoration via invasive species removal.

Journal

Ecological Restoration – University of Wisconsin Press

Published: Dec 9, 2010

There are no references for this article.