Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Incorporating Outcome Uncertainty and Prior Outcome Beliefs in Stated Preferences

Incorporating Outcome Uncertainty and Prior Outcome Beliefs in Stated Preferences ABSTRACT: Stated preference studies tell respondents that policies create environmental changes with varying levels of uncertainty. However, respondents may include their own a priori assessments of uncertainty when making choices among policy options. Using a choice experiment eliciting respondents’ preferences for conservation policies under climate change, we find that higher outcome uncertainty reduces utility. When accounting for endogeneity, we find that prior beliefs play a significant role in this cost of uncertainty. Thus, merely stating “objective” levels of outcome uncertainty will not necessarily solve the problem of people valuing something differently from originally intended: respondents’ prior beliefs must be accounted for. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Land Economics University of Wisconsin Press

Incorporating Outcome Uncertainty and Prior Outcome Beliefs in Stated Preferences

Land Economics , Volume 91 (2) – Apr 13, 2015

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-wisconsin-press/incorporating-outcome-uncertainty-and-prior-outcome-beliefs-in-stated-27Mi00zNGO

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of Wisconsin Press
Copyright
Copyright by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
ISSN
1543-8325
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Stated preference studies tell respondents that policies create environmental changes with varying levels of uncertainty. However, respondents may include their own a priori assessments of uncertainty when making choices among policy options. Using a choice experiment eliciting respondents’ preferences for conservation policies under climate change, we find that higher outcome uncertainty reduces utility. When accounting for endogeneity, we find that prior beliefs play a significant role in this cost of uncertainty. Thus, merely stating “objective” levels of outcome uncertainty will not necessarily solve the problem of people valuing something differently from originally intended: respondents’ prior beliefs must be accounted for.

Journal

Land EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin Press

Published: Apr 13, 2015

There are no references for this article.