Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Can Customary Land Tenure Facilitate Agricultural Productivity Growth? Evidence from Burkina Faso

Can Customary Land Tenure Facilitate Agricultural Productivity Growth? Evidence from Burkina Faso <p>ABSTRACT:</p><p>In Burkina Faso, land is managed through customary tenure, which discourages land rentals and sales. Yet it permits land transactions through an institution called borrowing. This study investigates whether the borrowed status of land affects the seasonal crop and input choices as well as longer-term, productivity-enhancing investments made on it. Analysis using nationally representative, plot-level data from the Enquête Permanente Agricole suggests that borrowed land is more intensively farmed in terms of cropping and inputs. We find no evidence of borrowed lands having fewer erosion-preventing investments or of being fallowed less than nonborrowed (inherited) land. <i>(JEL O13, O17)</i></p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Land Economics University of Wisconsin Press

Can Customary Land Tenure Facilitate Agricultural Productivity Growth? Evidence from Burkina Faso

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-wisconsin-press/can-customary-land-tenure-facilitate-agricultural-productivity-growth-d2cH3Juw0e
Publisher
University of Wisconsin Press
Copyright
Copyright © Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
ISSN
1543-8325

Abstract

<p>ABSTRACT:</p><p>In Burkina Faso, land is managed through customary tenure, which discourages land rentals and sales. Yet it permits land transactions through an institution called borrowing. This study investigates whether the borrowed status of land affects the seasonal crop and input choices as well as longer-term, productivity-enhancing investments made on it. Analysis using nationally representative, plot-level data from the Enquête Permanente Agricole suggests that borrowed land is more intensively farmed in terms of cropping and inputs. We find no evidence of borrowed lands having fewer erosion-preventing investments or of being fallowed less than nonborrowed (inherited) land. <i>(JEL O13, O17)</i></p>

Journal

Land EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin Press

Published: Jul 2, 2020

There are no references for this article.