Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Bridging versus Bonding Social Capital and the Management of Common Pool Resources

Bridging versus Bonding Social Capital and the Management of Common Pool Resources <p>ABSTRACT:</p><p>Social capital facilitates community governance of common pool resources (CPRs), but not all social capital is alike. We argue that bonding social capital can improve CPRs management, while the effect of bridging social capital is mixed, depending on household poverty level and resource quality. We test these predictions using primary data from Yunnan Province in China on firewood collection on communal lands. We find that both bonding and bridging social capital decrease firewood extraction, but they erode each other&apos;s effect. Further, bridging social capital decreases firewood collection mainly for those near subsistence levels, or when forest quality is high. (JEL C31, O13)</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Land Economics University of Wisconsin Press

Bridging versus Bonding Social Capital and the Management of Common Pool Resources

Land Economics , Volume 94 (4) – Oct 15, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-wisconsin-press/bridging-versus-bonding-social-capital-and-the-management-of-common-3DVNc0w3I4

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of Wisconsin Press
Copyright
Copyright by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
ISSN
1543-8325

Abstract

<p>ABSTRACT:</p><p>Social capital facilitates community governance of common pool resources (CPRs), but not all social capital is alike. We argue that bonding social capital can improve CPRs management, while the effect of bridging social capital is mixed, depending on household poverty level and resource quality. We test these predictions using primary data from Yunnan Province in China on firewood collection on communal lands. We find that both bonding and bridging social capital decrease firewood extraction, but they erode each other&apos;s effect. Further, bridging social capital decreases firewood collection mainly for those near subsistence levels, or when forest quality is high. (JEL C31, O13)</p>

Journal

Land EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin Press

Published: Oct 15, 2018

There are no references for this article.