Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

An Exploratory Assessment of Federal Land Restoration Contractors and Their Views on the Restoration Industry

An Exploratory Assessment of Federal Land Restoration Contractors and Their Views on the... <p>ABSTRACT:</p><p>Forest and watershed restoration are important activities on public lands across the U.S. Many federal agencies rely on contractors to accomplish the work. Despite the role that restoration contractors serve, research about them is limited. In a 2013 exploratory assessment, we surveyed 671 vendors who performed restoration work for federal land management agencies between 2001 and 2012 to ask them about their business&apos; characteristics and their perspectives on the restoration industry. Most businesses were family owned (76%), 54% of the vendors worked within commuting distance at least 75% of the time, and 87% reported that their business&apos; amount of work fluctuated seasonally. The most common business structures were corporations (51%), sole proprietorship (22%), and LLCs (20%). The primary type of restoration work that respondents&apos; businesses engaged in were equipment-intensive (30%), labor-intensive (30%), or technically-intensive work (27%). Labor costs consumed an average of 41% of annual expenses followed by equipment (23%), overhead (17%), and materials (14%). Sixty-two percent of respondents reported that at least 50% of their contract work was with government agencies and 44% reported that at least 50% of their revenue was from restoration work. The most common factors rated as very or extremely limiting to work opportunities were regional competition (40%) and demand for work (39%). We report statistically significant differences across geographic regions and respondents&apos; primary type of work (i.e., labor-intensive, equipment-intensive, or technical). The time period in which the work was performed by respondents included various stages of the Great Recession, which likely affected the restoration work climate and the survey responses.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecological Restoration University of Wisconsin Press

An Exploratory Assessment of Federal Land Restoration Contractors and Their Views on the Restoration Industry

Ecological Restoration , Volume 37 (1) – Mar 18, 2019

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-wisconsin-press/an-exploratory-assessment-of-federal-land-restoration-contractors-and-q3RBfqQTWL
Publisher
University of Wisconsin Press
ISSN
1543-4079

Abstract

<p>ABSTRACT:</p><p>Forest and watershed restoration are important activities on public lands across the U.S. Many federal agencies rely on contractors to accomplish the work. Despite the role that restoration contractors serve, research about them is limited. In a 2013 exploratory assessment, we surveyed 671 vendors who performed restoration work for federal land management agencies between 2001 and 2012 to ask them about their business&apos; characteristics and their perspectives on the restoration industry. Most businesses were family owned (76%), 54% of the vendors worked within commuting distance at least 75% of the time, and 87% reported that their business&apos; amount of work fluctuated seasonally. The most common business structures were corporations (51%), sole proprietorship (22%), and LLCs (20%). The primary type of restoration work that respondents&apos; businesses engaged in were equipment-intensive (30%), labor-intensive (30%), or technically-intensive work (27%). Labor costs consumed an average of 41% of annual expenses followed by equipment (23%), overhead (17%), and materials (14%). Sixty-two percent of respondents reported that at least 50% of their contract work was with government agencies and 44% reported that at least 50% of their revenue was from restoration work. The most common factors rated as very or extremely limiting to work opportunities were regional competition (40%) and demand for work (39%). We report statistically significant differences across geographic regions and respondents&apos; primary type of work (i.e., labor-intensive, equipment-intensive, or technical). The time period in which the work was performed by respondents included various stages of the Great Recession, which likely affected the restoration work climate and the survey responses.</p>

Journal

Ecological RestorationUniversity of Wisconsin Press

Published: Mar 18, 2019

There are no references for this article.