Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Rural Economics of René de Girardin: Landscapes at the Service of L'Idéologie Nobiliaire

The Rural Economics of René de Girardin: Landscapes at the Service of L'Idéologie Nobiliaire <p>Abstract:</p><p>René-Louis de Girardin is remembered for having invited Rousseau to hisErmenonville estate. Girardin believed it necessary to further the debate on gardens on the basis of a principle of continuity that rejects any idea of enclosure. This made it possible to establish an agricultural model that increased production and finally allowed the monopoly in grain sales to be broken. At the service of <i>l&apos;idéologienobiliaire</i>, his analysis shows the existence of a form of economic thinking in the second half of the eighteenth century that, giving primacy to agriculture, nevertheless cannot fall within the paths of physiocrats and agronomists.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the History of Ideas University of Pennsylvania Press

The Rural Economics of René de Girardin: Landscapes at the Service of L&apos;Idéologie Nobiliaire

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-pennsylvania-press/the-rural-economics-of-ren-de-girardin-landscapes-at-the-service-of-l-O74tvD2Kns

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of Pennsylvania Press
Copyright
Copyright © The Journal of the History of Ideas, Inc.
ISSN
1086-3222

Abstract

<p>Abstract:</p><p>René-Louis de Girardin is remembered for having invited Rousseau to hisErmenonville estate. Girardin believed it necessary to further the debate on gardens on the basis of a principle of continuity that rejects any idea of enclosure. This made it possible to establish an agricultural model that increased production and finally allowed the monopoly in grain sales to be broken. At the service of <i>l&apos;idéologienobiliaire</i>, his analysis shows the existence of a form of economic thinking in the second half of the eighteenth century that, giving primacy to agriculture, nevertheless cannot fall within the paths of physiocrats and agronomists.</p>

Journal

Journal of the History of IdeasUniversity of Pennsylvania Press

Published: Jul 28, 2020

There are no references for this article.