Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Abstract: Abstract: In the aftermath of Maimonides’ death in 1204, competing efforts to define and redefine the Maimonidean legacy were instrumental in shaping a number of Jewish intellectual and spiritual movements in the thirteenth century and beyond. The present paper looks at the immediate context of this legacy in Maimonides’ Egypt through the controversial career of his son and communal successor, Abraham (1186-1237). Rather than compare the philosophical or mystical tendencies of father and son, this paper looks at their record of religious leadership by comparing their handling of three disputed liturgical customs. While their divergent approaches to communal leadership is evident in each case, Abraham consistently compared his own controversial synagogue reforms with what he considered to be his father’s earlier failed efforts at reform. In the most intriguing example, Abraham appealed to his father’s legacy even when openly diverging from the latter’s stated positions, such as in his effort to incorporate pietist and devotional reforms into synagogue life.
Jewish Quarterly Review – University of Pennsylvania Press
Published: May 3, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.