Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
<p>Abstract:</p><p>Ann Snitow challenges a common misreading of the U.S. feminist past as "strict, puritanical earnestness," offering a personal, potted history of other feminist tones of voice used in response to tireless sexism and relentless sexual harassment. Tone is an elusive subject, but in each social context, feminists seek a language to be believed, using tones of voice that are currently available. This earlier radical feminism was full of high spirits and sweeping demands, providing a valuable legacy for today in the challenge to continually reinvent a more complex, resistant, and sexually curious feminism. Snitow concludes with a reader's guide of recent commentary on #MeToo.</p>
Dissent – University of Pennsylvania Press
Published: May 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.