Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reading Newspapers: Press and Public in Eighteenth-Century Britain and America by Uriel Heyd (review)

Reading Newspapers: Press and Public in Eighteenth-Century Britain and America by Uriel Heyd... REVIEWS Weyler is also wonderfully subtle in discussing race. She explores its importance while refusing to anoint it the only explanatory variable. ``I do not mean to assert that race did not play a factor in Wheatley's publishing experiences,'' she writes, ``but I would like to put to rest any notion that racism alone prevented Wheatley from publishing a volume of poetry'' (62). Weyler also attends to something perhaps as difficult to analyze as race--artistic merit. Even as she explores the effects of authors' social position and networking prowess on the popularity of elegies, for example, Weyler also bracingly acknowledges that some elegies ``are simply awful from an aesthetic perspective'' (45). Weyler's treatment of Clementina Rind's Virginia Gazette, in turn, blends attention to Rind's networking acumen with a rich discussion of Rind's humor and meticulous editing. Such moments, and there are many, are a model of the way print can illuminate both cultures and idiosyncratic individuals. In the end, even the ricketiness of Weyler's ``outsider'' framework is thought-provoking. Print is not anonymous, as Michael Warner's critics have explained in the years since Letters of the Republic: Publication and the Public sphere in Eighteenth Century America (Boston, 1992) took http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Early Republic University of Pennsylvania Press

Reading Newspapers: Press and Public in Eighteenth-Century Britain and America by Uriel Heyd (review)

Journal of the Early Republic , Volume 34 (2)

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-pennsylvania-press/reading-newspapers-press-and-public-in-eighteenth-century-britain-and-UjxaLQzMmh
Publisher
University of Pennsylvania Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Society for Historians of the Early American Republic.
ISSN
1553-0620
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

REVIEWS Weyler is also wonderfully subtle in discussing race. She explores its importance while refusing to anoint it the only explanatory variable. ``I do not mean to assert that race did not play a factor in Wheatley's publishing experiences,'' she writes, ``but I would like to put to rest any notion that racism alone prevented Wheatley from publishing a volume of poetry'' (62). Weyler also attends to something perhaps as difficult to analyze as race--artistic merit. Even as she explores the effects of authors' social position and networking prowess on the popularity of elegies, for example, Weyler also bracingly acknowledges that some elegies ``are simply awful from an aesthetic perspective'' (45). Weyler's treatment of Clementina Rind's Virginia Gazette, in turn, blends attention to Rind's networking acumen with a rich discussion of Rind's humor and meticulous editing. Such moments, and there are many, are a model of the way print can illuminate both cultures and idiosyncratic individuals. In the end, even the ricketiness of Weyler's ``outsider'' framework is thought-provoking. Print is not anonymous, as Michael Warner's critics have explained in the years since Letters of the Republic: Publication and the Public sphere in Eighteenth Century America (Boston, 1992) took

Journal

Journal of the Early RepublicUniversity of Pennsylvania Press

There are no references for this article.