Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Laundering Racism Through the Courts: The Scandal of States' Rights

Laundering Racism Through the Courts: The Scandal of States' Rights <p>ABSTRACT:</p><p>When three conservative law students founded the Federalist Society at Yale Law School in 1982, they probably didn&apos;t expect that it would become one of the most influential legal organizations in the United States. Since roughly the Society&apos;s founding, the doctrine of federalism has become the basis for a new, conservative orthodoxy in U.S. law. The last two Chief Justices of the Supreme Court, William Rehnquist and John Roberts, have been strong adherents of federalism, as have virtually all of the other conservative justices. And President Trump is currently stocking the lower federal courts with like-minded jurists at a record pace. By federalism, these legal conservatives mean that the authority of the federal government is limited, that states are sovereign bodies, and that courts should enforce limitations on federal power and bolster the power of states. On its face, the conservatives&apos; attachment to federalism may not seem particularly objectionable, but the practical consequences of the conservatives&apos; attachment to federalism are far from benign. For African Americans, particularly those living in states of the former Confederacy, the impact of federalist doctrine as implemented by the Supreme Court has been no less than devastating. Lynn Adelman explores federalism in the context of two of the Roberts Court&apos;s most important federalist decisions, Shelby County v. Holder and National Federation of Independent Business ("NFIB") v. Sebelius.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Dissent University of Pennsylvania Press

Laundering Racism Through the Courts: The Scandal of States&apos; Rights

Dissent , Volume 65 (3) – Aug 8, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-pennsylvania-press/laundering-racism-through-the-courts-the-scandal-of-states-apos-rights-RTZ9Wn52Y6
Publisher
University of Pennsylvania Press
ISSN
1946-0910

Abstract

<p>ABSTRACT:</p><p>When three conservative law students founded the Federalist Society at Yale Law School in 1982, they probably didn&apos;t expect that it would become one of the most influential legal organizations in the United States. Since roughly the Society&apos;s founding, the doctrine of federalism has become the basis for a new, conservative orthodoxy in U.S. law. The last two Chief Justices of the Supreme Court, William Rehnquist and John Roberts, have been strong adherents of federalism, as have virtually all of the other conservative justices. And President Trump is currently stocking the lower federal courts with like-minded jurists at a record pace. By federalism, these legal conservatives mean that the authority of the federal government is limited, that states are sovereign bodies, and that courts should enforce limitations on federal power and bolster the power of states. On its face, the conservatives&apos; attachment to federalism may not seem particularly objectionable, but the practical consequences of the conservatives&apos; attachment to federalism are far from benign. For African Americans, particularly those living in states of the former Confederacy, the impact of federalist doctrine as implemented by the Supreme Court has been no less than devastating. Lynn Adelman explores federalism in the context of two of the Roberts Court&apos;s most important federalist decisions, Shelby County v. Holder and National Federation of Independent Business ("NFIB") v. Sebelius.</p>

Journal

DissentUniversity of Pennsylvania Press

Published: Aug 8, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month