Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Pauline Goul e Th Pointless Ecology of Renaissance Cynicism Le but de nostre carriere, c’est la mort, c’est l’object necessaire de nostre visée : si elle nous effraye, comme est il possible d’aller un pas en avant, sans e fi bvre? Le remede du vulgaire c’est de n’y penser pas. Mais de quelle brutale stupidité luy peut venir un si grossier aveuglement? e g Th oal of our career is death. It is the necessary object of our aim. If it frightens us, how is it possible to go a step forward without feverishness? e r Th emedy of the common herd is not to think about it. But from what brutish stupidity can come so gross a blindness! (Montaigne 84, 69)1 NELL (sans baisser la voix) Rien n’est plus drôle que le malheur, je te l’accorde. Mais— (NELL (without lowering her voice) Nothing is funnier than tragedy, I’ll grant you that. But—) (Beckett, Fin de partie 31) It was the summer of 2017. The New York Magazine published David Wallace- Wells’ “Uninhabitable Earth,” an article detailing all the possible ways in which climate change could make the earth inhabitable for human beings. In the subtitle, the author proposed
The Comparatist – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Nov 15, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.