Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The Innovation of Milton’s Machiavellian Son by Angus Fletcher lassical repu blicansare on the whole wary of religion.So me, like Thomas j efferson, are agnostics who want it rigorously segre- Cgated from public life. Others, like NiccolòMachia velli, are sus- pected atheistswho value it only as an extension of statep ower. Even john Milton,th e rare republican to dissent from this secularp erspec- tive, seems unintentionally to confirm that republics cannot also be theocracies.Wh en admirers of Milton’sp olitics explore his theology, they prefer to focus upon Satan,E ve, and Chaos as reservoirs of free- dom. For when scholars attend to Milton’s God, the deity that they dis- cover seems too rule-bound to permit the self-determination necessar y for republicanvirtue .In Milton’s Good God, Dennis Danielsondescrib es Milton’sview of libertyby arguing: “given God’s offer of divine grace, man is free either to rejectit and use his own innate power to sin, or else to accept it and use the power received from God to refrainfro m sinning. . . . [S]o far as man is concerned, sin is by commission and moral virtue by omission.” j oan Bennettarriv es at a similar view by aligning For a discussion
Studies in Philology – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Jan 13, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.