Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Influence of State Annexation Laws on the Growth of Selected Southern Cities

The Influence of State Annexation Laws on the Growth of Selected Southern Cities <p>A major theme in the study of the modern North American city is the disparity between the central city and its suburbs. This paper addresses one facet of this issue by exploring the relationship among metropolitan population growth, types of annexation legislation, growth of special districts and the health of central cities as measured by rates of population growth. We ask: does annexation policy influence central city growth?</p> <p>To test these linkages we employ a classic typology of state annexation laws that gauges the range of options for public involvement in the decision to annex. Data describing growth in population and in the number of special districts and municipalities within MSAs in a sample of nine southern states are used to test three hypotheses. The states are: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North and South Carolina and Tennessee.</p> <p>Our results suggest that the more restrictive the annexation legislation, the greater the level of political fragmentation in the form of increased development of special districts. On the other hand, we find that less strict annexation legislation provides more latitude for the central city growth.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Southeastern Geographer University of North Carolina Press

The Influence of State Annexation Laws on the Growth of Selected Southern Cities

Southeastern Geographer , Volume 47 (1) – May 14, 2007

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/the-influence-of-state-annexation-laws-on-the-growth-of-selected-EfSO0hqiTq

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 the Southeastern Division, Association of American Geographers.
ISSN
1549-6929

Abstract

<p>A major theme in the study of the modern North American city is the disparity between the central city and its suburbs. This paper addresses one facet of this issue by exploring the relationship among metropolitan population growth, types of annexation legislation, growth of special districts and the health of central cities as measured by rates of population growth. We ask: does annexation policy influence central city growth?</p> <p>To test these linkages we employ a classic typology of state annexation laws that gauges the range of options for public involvement in the decision to annex. Data describing growth in population and in the number of special districts and municipalities within MSAs in a sample of nine southern states are used to test three hypotheses. The states are: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North and South Carolina and Tennessee.</p> <p>Our results suggest that the more restrictive the annexation legislation, the greater the level of political fragmentation in the form of increased development of special districts. On the other hand, we find that less strict annexation legislation provides more latitude for the central city growth.</p>

Journal

Southeastern GeographerUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: May 14, 2007

There are no references for this article.