Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Paul J h. eal D e D Th eath of Law and Literature An Optimistic Eulogy I spent last Saturday morning leading a group of federal judges in a vigorous and largely successful roundtable discussion of Ariel Dorfm D ae n a ’s th pla an y,d the Maiden. e Th deep underlying cause of this event was surely Michael Palencia- Roth—and not just because he wrote me a nice letter of recommendation to law school years ago. His responsibility runs deeper, to the very substance of my under- standing of the relationship between law and literature, an interdisciplinary e fi ld of study that had barely started in the late seventies when Michael r fi st became my teacher and mentor. He is why we read a play rather than an academic essay, and it’s his inu fl ence that lets me proclaim the death of the Law and Literature movement with an optimistic bent. Although the Brothers Grimm had done work identifying the common ety- mology of various poetic and legal terms as early as 6,181 the modern Law and Literature movement begins with the 76 91 publication of James Boyd White’s e Th Legal Imagination. White,
The Comparatist – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Jun 12, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.