Stage Fright: Modernism, Anti-Theatricality, and Drama (review)

Stage Fright: Modernism, Anti-Theatricality, and Drama (review) THE COMPAKATIST MARTIN PUCHNER. Stage Fright: Modernism, Anti-Theatricality, and Drama. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins UP, 2002. ? + 234 pp. Martin Puchner's book, in the light of critical theory about the modemist era, makes a new point of entry into the issues of how genres (dramatic and nondramatic as well) may have constituted an anti-theatrical tradition as resistance to theater by transforming its spaces, actors, and objects. Unlike most studies that deny anti-theatricality as a category oftheater, Puchner shows how the tradition of antitheatricalism presents an ambivalence that finds its counterpart in what he names "(pro) theatricalism" and that both are closely intertwined and have similar aesthetic goals. By analyzing the values ofmodernism as an attack to the theater, he locates the emergence ofsuch a modernist "ambivalence" that uses the theater as basis for avant-garde practices in various genres. Puchner traces a genealogy ofthis tradition dividing his book into three major sections, thereby accounting for avant-garde theatricalism in the form ofvarious modemist literary works that he views as antitheatrical. Locating this tradition back to its founder Richard Wagner, Part I, "The Invention ofTheatricality," is the point ofdeparture for the subsequent emergence of such a modemist "ambivalent" stance about the theater. Part ?, "The Modernist Closet Drama," gathers such texts that are marked by their modemist ambivalence (in various forms and genres) in regards to the theater. Specifically important to the author is how although these works resist the theater yet they never leave it alone. Stéphane Mallarmé's "closet drama," exemplified in what Puchner proposes to call "theater-texts. " James Joyce's novelistic use ofthe theater in "Circe" opens up to a new narrative form based on what he names "the choreography oflanguage." In the same vein, Puchner shows how Gertrude Stein's dramatic texts such like Four Saints never take the dramatic form for granted. These such works like Hérodiade and Igitur, defies the usual literary genres to present texts are essential in that they, according to the author, characterize this tradition of resistance to theater and establish it as one type ofanti-theatricalism to an extreme: what he defines as a diegetic theater. Thus part III "The Diegetic Theater" explores more of these new forms of dramatic texts and their ambivalence towards theater. Such is the case with the poetry of William Butler Yeats in terms of stage and acting (precisely through dance). Puchner then leads us to the familiar epic theatre ofBertold Brecht in its use ofacting, gesture, and text, thereby transforming the theater into a new function. His argument finally closes with the link between this tradition and the postwar stage, specifically in the theater of Samuel Beckett and how gestures tend to disappear entirely to present a new form ofanti-theatricalism rooted in the theater itself. Concluding his work with how this "anti-theatrical impulse" impacted postmodernist genres, Puchner makes a convincing statement about a tradition that has been wrongly categorized and neglected in theoretical studies. Although this comparative study deals with a rich array oftexts targeting readers that are supposed to be familiar with them, yet it is remarkable in shedding a new light on both theater and cross-disciplinary studies. Puchner's book should be regarded as a capital addition to the history oftheater as well as an innovative theoretical approach rooted in literary history. Anne V. Cirella-UrrutiaHuston Tillotson College Vol. 28 (2004): 165 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Comparatist University of North Carolina Press

Stage Fright: Modernism, Anti-Theatricality, and Drama (review)

The Comparatist, Volume 28 (1) – Oct 3, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/stage-fright-modernism-anti-theatricality-and-drama-review-MSV5kR3odv
Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Comparative Literature Association.
ISSN
1559-0887
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

THE COMPAKATIST MARTIN PUCHNER. Stage Fright: Modernism, Anti-Theatricality, and Drama. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins UP, 2002. ? + 234 pp. Martin Puchner's book, in the light of critical theory about the modemist era, makes a new point of entry into the issues of how genres (dramatic and nondramatic as well) may have constituted an anti-theatrical tradition as resistance to theater by transforming its spaces, actors, and objects. Unlike most studies that deny anti-theatricality as a category oftheater, Puchner shows how the tradition of antitheatricalism presents an ambivalence that finds its counterpart in what he names "(pro) theatricalism" and that both are closely intertwined and have similar aesthetic goals. By analyzing the values ofmodernism as an attack to the theater, he locates the emergence ofsuch a modernist "ambivalence" that uses the theater as basis for avant-garde practices in various genres. Puchner traces a genealogy ofthis tradition dividing his book into three major sections, thereby accounting for avant-garde theatricalism in the form ofvarious modemist literary works that he views as antitheatrical. Locating this tradition back to its founder Richard Wagner, Part I, "The Invention ofTheatricality," is the point ofdeparture for the subsequent emergence of such a modemist "ambivalent" stance about the theater. Part ?, "The Modernist Closet Drama," gathers such texts that are marked by their modemist ambivalence (in various forms and genres) in regards to the theater. Specifically important to the author is how although these works resist the theater yet they never leave it alone. Stéphane Mallarmé's "closet drama," exemplified in what Puchner proposes to call "theater-texts. " James Joyce's novelistic use ofthe theater in "Circe" opens up to a new narrative form based on what he names "the choreography oflanguage." In the same vein, Puchner shows how Gertrude Stein's dramatic texts such like Four Saints never take the dramatic form for granted. These such works like Hérodiade and Igitur, defies the usual literary genres to present texts are essential in that they, according to the author, characterize this tradition of resistance to theater and establish it as one type ofanti-theatricalism to an extreme: what he defines as a diegetic theater. Thus part III "The Diegetic Theater" explores more of these new forms of dramatic texts and their ambivalence towards theater. Such is the case with the poetry of William Butler Yeats in terms of stage and acting (precisely through dance). Puchner then leads us to the familiar epic theatre ofBertold Brecht in its use ofacting, gesture, and text, thereby transforming the theater into a new function. His argument finally closes with the link between this tradition and the postwar stage, specifically in the theater of Samuel Beckett and how gestures tend to disappear entirely to present a new form ofanti-theatricalism rooted in the theater itself. Concluding his work with how this "anti-theatrical impulse" impacted postmodernist genres, Puchner makes a convincing statement about a tradition that has been wrongly categorized and neglected in theoretical studies. Although this comparative study deals with a rich array oftexts targeting readers that are supposed to be familiar with them, yet it is remarkable in shedding a new light on both theater and cross-disciplinary studies. Puchner's book should be regarded as a capital addition to the history oftheater as well as an innovative theoretical approach rooted in literary history. Anne V. Cirella-UrrutiaHuston Tillotson College Vol. 28 (2004): 165

Journal

The ComparatistUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Oct 3, 2004

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off