Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

“Neutrality” as Nomos?: Paradigm, Nuance, and the Politics of Coterritoriality in Late Barthes

“Neutrality” as Nomos?: Paradigm, Nuance, and the Politics of Coterritoriality in Late Barthes Christian Moraru “Neutrality” as Nomos? Paradigm, Nuance, and the Politics of Coterritoriality in Late Barthes I’ve spoken of the nuance as a fundamental practice of communication a number of times; I even risked giving it a name: diaphoralogy. Barthes, e P Th reparation of the Novel 45. e t Th erritory’s generic function . . . [i]sn’t just a matter of security, it also has to do with a constraint of distance: the spacing of subjects between one territory and another within the territory itself. Intra- territorial spacing is reduced whenever the territory is under threat . . . Barthes, How to Live Together 117 There are two references in my tittle that call for some clarification upfront. The most obvious is, of course, to Roland Barthes, specifically to his 1976–1980 Col- lège de France lectures and seminars. For these, the critic either took detailed notes that he used and left as such—fragments showing various degrees of elabo- ration, “bulleted” lists serving the usual mnemonic purpose, and the like—or pre- pared lengthier, more complex, and more uid fl presentations. Also available in English, they came out from Seuil in a series of three volumes more than twenty years aer http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Comparatist University of North Carolina Press

“Neutrality” as Nomos?: Paradigm, Nuance, and the Politics of Coterritoriality in Late Barthes

The Comparatist , Volume 40 – Nov 11, 2016

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/neutrality-as-nomos-paradigm-nuance-and-the-politics-of-L6pGwOKuUN

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Comparative Literature Association.
ISSN
1559-0887

Abstract

Christian Moraru “Neutrality” as Nomos? Paradigm, Nuance, and the Politics of Coterritoriality in Late Barthes I’ve spoken of the nuance as a fundamental practice of communication a number of times; I even risked giving it a name: diaphoralogy. Barthes, e P Th reparation of the Novel 45. e t Th erritory’s generic function . . . [i]sn’t just a matter of security, it also has to do with a constraint of distance: the spacing of subjects between one territory and another within the territory itself. Intra- territorial spacing is reduced whenever the territory is under threat . . . Barthes, How to Live Together 117 There are two references in my tittle that call for some clarification upfront. The most obvious is, of course, to Roland Barthes, specifically to his 1976–1980 Col- lège de France lectures and seminars. For these, the critic either took detailed notes that he used and left as such—fragments showing various degrees of elabo- ration, “bulleted” lists serving the usual mnemonic purpose, and the like—or pre- pared lengthier, more complex, and more uid fl presentations. Also available in English, they came out from Seuil in a series of three volumes more than twenty years aer

Journal

The ComparatistUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Nov 11, 2016

There are no references for this article.