Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
and community scenes. He insists on the vitality of American theater, provided the distinction between low- and highbrow, and between professional and amateur practices, is overlooked: “Ce que j’ai appelé le déclin et la n fi du théâtre en Améri - que n’est pas la n fi du théâtre en soi ou de tout le théâtre. . . . Ce qui est en jeu, c’est quel théâtre et quelle sorte de culture vont survivre. . . . un théâtre de qualité peut survivre, mais il ne peut pas vivre. Il peut survivre dans les marges, les universités et les caves, mais mourir au grand jour” [By the decline and fall of theater in America I did not mean the end of theater itself or as a practice. . . . What is at stake here is what kind of theater and culture will survive. . . . quality theater can survive but cannot live. It can survive in the margins, like universities and cellars, and appear oci ffi ally dead] (217). e Th book is peppered with bracketed Anglicisms, which the author deems useful to the reader’s comprehension, though their number and relevance seem question- able. e Th publication
The Comparatist – University of North Carolina Press
Published: May 29, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.