Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Front Porch

Front Porch Appalachia is deeply like and deeply joined to larger worlds, but also still unique, still partly meshed in creative tension with its special past. All photos courtesy of Roger May. As far back as colonial days, all the experts agreed that the Mountain South was different, even when they couldn't explain how or why. Observers often blamed degenerate settlers. Royal governor Alexander Spotswood claimed that Virginia's mountaineers wanted "all the necessarys of life with little labor" and sneered that "it is fully well known what morals such people bring with them hither." Two centuries later, sociologist Rupert Vance chose his words more carefully but still endorsed the conventional wisdom that Appalachia was unique. In traveling from Grandfather Mountain to the Mississippi, he declared in 1932, "It needs but a customs barrier and a varying language to mark the limit of two cultures." Unlike Spotswood, the social scientist denied that mountain people were inherently backward. Instead, Vance diagnosed Appalachia as an "outstanding study in isolation," and a "retarded frontier," where self-sufficient farm families still consumed more of their crops than they sold. As a result, he claimed, poverty reigned and "the cash income per farm is as low as http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Southern Cultures University of North Carolina Press

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/front-porch-ULLJSbM2CE

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © Center for the Study of the American South.
ISSN
1534-1488
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Appalachia is deeply like and deeply joined to larger worlds, but also still unique, still partly meshed in creative tension with its special past. All photos courtesy of Roger May. As far back as colonial days, all the experts agreed that the Mountain South was different, even when they couldn't explain how or why. Observers often blamed degenerate settlers. Royal governor Alexander Spotswood claimed that Virginia's mountaineers wanted "all the necessarys of life with little labor" and sneered that "it is fully well known what morals such people bring with them hither." Two centuries later, sociologist Rupert Vance chose his words more carefully but still endorsed the conventional wisdom that Appalachia was unique. In traveling from Grandfather Mountain to the Mississippi, he declared in 1932, "It needs but a customs barrier and a varying language to mark the limit of two cultures." Unlike Spotswood, the social scientist denied that mountain people were inherently backward. Instead, Vance diagnosed Appalachia as an "outstanding study in isolation," and a "retarded frontier," where self-sufficient farm families still consumed more of their crops than they sold. As a result, he claimed, poverty reigned and "the cash income per farm is as low as

Journal

Southern CulturesUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Apr 16, 2017

There are no references for this article.