Abstract: Three major developments in the delivery of digital elevation models (DEMs) to the general public include the USGS national elevation dataset (NED), worldwide Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEM for land area between latitudes 60°N and 60°S, and light detection and ranging (LIDAR) DEM for the state of North Carolina. These DEMs were created using different acquisition methods and technologies, and they can differ in how they represent the topography of the same area. This paper assesses the differences in these DEMs and illustrates how these differences can produce different analytical outcomes when used to study local problems. The Randleman Reservoir project in Guilford and Randolph counties, North Carolina, is used as a case study for comparing the DEMs. We found that a) the USGS, SRTM, and LIDAR DEMs differed, b) modeled reservoir extents and volumetric capacities differed substantially, with the USGS DEMs producing the smallest capacity and extent measurements and the LIDAR DEM producing the largest, and c) there was noncontiguous “ponding” on the reservoir extents derived from the USGS or SRTM DEM, but almost no “ponding” on the reservoir extents derived from the LIDAR DEM.
Southeastern Geographer – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Jul 10, 2008
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera