Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
e ugene eo yang A Mestizo of the Mind Maodun in the Writings of Octavio Paz1 In his Labyrinth of Solitude, Octavio Paz describes the pachuco as “a word of uncer- tain derivation, saying nothing and saying everything. It is a strange word with no den fi ite meaning; or, to be more exact, it is charged like all popular creations with a diversity of meanings” (Labyrinth 14). “e Th pachuco,” Paz tells us, “has lost his whole inheritance: language, religion, customs, beliefs. He is left with only a body and a soul with which to confront the elements, defenseless against the stares of everyone. His disguise is a protection, but it also die ff rentiates and isolates him: it both hides him and points him out” (15). e Th logic of “saying nothing and saying everything,” and of the pachuco’s disguise that “both hides him and points him out” is precisely the logic of non-contradictory opposites, the logic of maodun. Another example of maodun, both ontological as well as epistemological, is Paz’s analysis of pachuco fashion: “e Th pachuco carries fashion to its ultimate consequences and turns it into something aesthetic. One of the principles that rules in
The Comparatist – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Jun 12, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.