<p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay compares the philosophies of art of Susanne Langer and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, highlighting some differences in their approaches to the subject matter. It addresses the thinkersâ formulation of the nature of philosophy, the role of paradox, the functions of art and language, and the relationship between philosopher and artist. In the work of each thinker, I find two elements, somewhat at odds with each other. One is a general account of the cultural function of art. The other is a sort of artistic vision advanced by way of proposing a modern vocation for art. As a result, I argue that Langer develops an âoutsideâ account of art, insofar as her work aims at explication of the creative process by way of maintaining some critical distance from it. Merleau-Ponty develops an âinsideâ account of art, insofar as he sees the phenomenologist as a peer to the painter, and advances an artistic vision of his own. I compare the two thinkers in order to show that they can address different audiences and pursue somewhat different goals. A charitable reading of each, keeping in mind their respective audiences and goals, could make the employment of these aesthetic theories more productive.</p>
The Journal of Aesthetic Education – University of Illinois Press
Published: Dec 5, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera