Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
brooks e. hefner After all these years I finally realized that the only thing I ever wanted to be in this business was a director. --Ray Milland (256) despite its many complications and qualifications since the late Andrew Sar ris introduced it to American readers in 1962, the "auteur theory" remains a central concern in film and media studies. Film festivals and art house programs continue to be organized around the auteur, and scholarly monographs and essays still largely attribute authorial inten tion to directors. Rather than embracing the new independent era of 1950s and 60s US film, however, Sarris's influential mistranslation of the Cahiers du Cinéma "politique des auteurs" (1957) looked back with nostalgia to the film makers of the studio era, where talented direc tors wrangled with subpar material to make great films out of the "tension between the director's personality and his material," the tension between art and commerce ("Notes" 7). Such a conflict also animated French concerns with the politique (better translated as "policy" or "politics"). In André Bazin's early critique of the politique, he notes the absurdity of this kind of definition of film authorship: "[p]aradoxically, the supporters of the politique des auteurs
Journal of Film and Video – University of Illinois Press
Published: Nov 27, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.