Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Is It a Forgery? Ask a Semanticist

Is It a Forgery? Ask a Semanticist <p>Abstract:</p><p>Forgery is a commonly, if uncomfortably, recognized force in the art world. It might be assumed, then, that the meaning of the term <i>forgery</i> is uniformly established. That assumption would be a mistake. Although <i>forgery</i> in general parlance has a basic, easily understood meaning, specialists of various stripes employ the term in restricted ways that bear the potential for confusion not only among the cognoscenti but for the broader public. In particular, legal terminology often avoids the term <i>forgery</i> altogether in regard to artworks, and several competing and incompatible versions of the difference between a forgery and a “fake” are in circulation in books, on web-sites, and in the literature of certain professional groups. Differentiating forgeries from fakes makes for an exercise in semantics that, while sometimes offering helpful explications, on the whole bodes difficulty. In our age of increasingly shared information, it is possible to inform members of limited groups, as well as other people taking an interest in their activities, about the specific meaning of <i>forgery</i> that is employed by a group. The result can be a helpful understanding for insiders. However, when restricted meanings are presented as if they are general meanings and they conflict with established language, confusion is imminent, and rectifying it is difficult if even possible.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Aesthetic Education University of Illinois Press

Is It a Forgery? Ask a Semanticist

The Journal of Aesthetic Education , Volume 54 (1) – Jan 30, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-illinois-press/is-it-a-forgery-ask-a-semanticist-LI0jxjv7KL
Publisher
University of Illinois Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.
ISSN
1543-7809

Abstract

<p>Abstract:</p><p>Forgery is a commonly, if uncomfortably, recognized force in the art world. It might be assumed, then, that the meaning of the term <i>forgery</i> is uniformly established. That assumption would be a mistake. Although <i>forgery</i> in general parlance has a basic, easily understood meaning, specialists of various stripes employ the term in restricted ways that bear the potential for confusion not only among the cognoscenti but for the broader public. In particular, legal terminology often avoids the term <i>forgery</i> altogether in regard to artworks, and several competing and incompatible versions of the difference between a forgery and a “fake” are in circulation in books, on web-sites, and in the literature of certain professional groups. Differentiating forgeries from fakes makes for an exercise in semantics that, while sometimes offering helpful explications, on the whole bodes difficulty. In our age of increasingly shared information, it is possible to inform members of limited groups, as well as other people taking an interest in their activities, about the specific meaning of <i>forgery</i> that is employed by a group. The result can be a helpful understanding for insiders. However, when restricted meanings are presented as if they are general meanings and they conflict with established language, confusion is imminent, and rectifying it is difficult if even possible.</p>

Journal

The Journal of Aesthetic EducationUniversity of Illinois Press

Published: Jan 30, 2020

There are no references for this article.