Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
<p>abstract:</p><p>The primary goal of this analysis is to examine the relationship between Performance-Based Funding (PBF) 2.0 policies and state expenditures to public higher education. Because ânew accountabilityâ theories suggest that when states seek to hold public higher education institutions accountable by impacting their revenues, public funding patterns should shift in some way to reflect this new set of inducements. Using a quasi-experimental design, difference-in-differences, I compared spending differences on public higher education before and after PBF 2.0 policy adoption in 50 states from 1995â96 to 2012â13. The findings show that PBF 2.0 policies exert a downward pressure on state spending to public higher education by between 5.55% and 10.68% when compared against states without such a policy. The results suggest that PBF policies may further exacerbate an already rough funding environment.</p>
Journal of Education Finance – University of Illinois Press
Published: Mar 10, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.