Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
<p>Abstract:</p><p>This article starts with a discussion of the role of tradition as it is related to creativity or originality in Western art theory and literary criticism before examining ideas of tradition and creativity in premodern Chinese calligraphy criticism. I elaborate that learning from the past has been regarded as the proper course to take in becoming a mature calligrapher, that in calligraphic practice, <i>linmo</i> (copying) and <i>dutie</i> (reading and contemplating the master's original work) are the two main approaches to past models. I propose that gu, as tradition, is an ever-changing and accumulative repertoire in Chinese calligraphy history. The last section studies the calligraphic theory of <i>tong-bian</i> (continuity-mutation), illustrating that Chinese calligraphic practice, or visual art practice at large, emphasizes the study of the past, an inheritance of tradition, but that creativity or originality is still a value embedded in Chinese aesthetics.</p>
The Journal of Aesthetic Education – University of Illinois Press
Published: Oct 22, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.