Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Abstract: In this paper, an overarching framework is presented and discussed that enables the mapping of approaches to the interpretation of creative acts or artifacts for the purposes of analyzing the underlying referential frameworks that inform assessment. Informed by literary and aesthetic theory, the framework’s horizontal axis relates to what might broadly be termed the sources or locus of meaning (that is, the author, the text, and the reader), and its vertical axis refers to broad approaches to how the problem of meaning is negotiated, whether representation or signification (differentiated in the framework as “eucharistic,” “objective,” and “operative” criticism). The framework was initially constructed to analyze the embedded and often tacit interpretative approaches underpinning assessment practices in the creative arts in higher education, particularly in fine-art studio practice, and, as such, the discussion of the methodological value of the framework is situated within this context.
The Journal of Aesthetic Education – University of Illinois Press
Published: Aug 30, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.