Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Validity of Proto-Southeastern Polynesian

The Validity of Proto-Southeastern Polynesian Comments Lawrence Kenji Rutter university of hawai`i In the June 2001 issue of Oceanic Linguistics, Steven Roger Fischer proposes a new subgroup within Proto-Polynesian, Southeastern Polynesian. In this subgroup, Fischer includes Eastern Tuamotuan (he claims that Western Tuamotuan belongs to the Tahitic subgroup, while Eastern Tuamotuan belongs to Southeastern), Mangarevan, Old Rapan, Pitcairn, Henderson, and Rapanui. His proposal fails on two grounds: (1) no evidence is provided for the inclusion of languages other than Mangarevan, and (2) the evidence provided to support the claim that Mangarevan is a Southeastern Polynesian language relies on doublets supposed to have resulted from an intrusion. However, there is an alternate explanation for the existence of these doublets. In the ²rst section of his article, F proposes the new subgroup, Southeastern Polynesian, and has it branching off from the Proto­Eastern Polynesian (PEP)1 node. The main problem with this proposal is that its subgrouping hypothesis seems to be based solely on a migration pattern, that is, the Eastern Polynesians' migration from the Marquesas-Tahiti area to Rapanui. However, migration patterns and subgrouping do not go hand in hand. That is, migration patterns do not necessarily correspond to the subgrouping of languages. Furthermore, F does not http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Oceanic Linguistics University of Hawai'I Press

The Validity of Proto-Southeastern Polynesian

Oceanic Linguistics , Volume 41 (1) – Jun 1, 2002

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-hawai-i-press/the-validity-of-proto-southeastern-polynesian-SgbkWdhoxw
Publisher
University of Hawai'I Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 University of Hawai'i Press.
ISSN
1527-9421
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Comments Lawrence Kenji Rutter university of hawai`i In the June 2001 issue of Oceanic Linguistics, Steven Roger Fischer proposes a new subgroup within Proto-Polynesian, Southeastern Polynesian. In this subgroup, Fischer includes Eastern Tuamotuan (he claims that Western Tuamotuan belongs to the Tahitic subgroup, while Eastern Tuamotuan belongs to Southeastern), Mangarevan, Old Rapan, Pitcairn, Henderson, and Rapanui. His proposal fails on two grounds: (1) no evidence is provided for the inclusion of languages other than Mangarevan, and (2) the evidence provided to support the claim that Mangarevan is a Southeastern Polynesian language relies on doublets supposed to have resulted from an intrusion. However, there is an alternate explanation for the existence of these doublets. In the ²rst section of his article, F proposes the new subgroup, Southeastern Polynesian, and has it branching off from the Proto­Eastern Polynesian (PEP)1 node. The main problem with this proposal is that its subgrouping hypothesis seems to be based solely on a migration pattern, that is, the Eastern Polynesians' migration from the Marquesas-Tahiti area to Rapanui. However, migration patterns and subgrouping do not go hand in hand. That is, migration patterns do not necessarily correspond to the subgrouping of languages. Furthermore, F does not

Journal

Oceanic LinguisticsUniversity of Hawai'I Press

Published: Jun 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.