Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Posal between the Mudang and Buddhist: In-between and Bypassing

The Posal between the Mudang and Buddhist: In-between and Bypassing Buddhism and Musok in Korea have been closely interrelated in many ways for a long time. Their affinities and similarities are acknowledged in terms of inclusiveness, inter-relationships and syncretism, while their differences are underlined by exclusiveness and specificities. In the classification of religions Musok is considered a popular religion, not an institutionalized religion like Buddhism. There has been little scholarly interest in the religious phenomenon that stands between Musok and Buddhism. This space is occupied by the hybrid religious figure of the <i>posal</i>. The <i>posal</i> is a religious officiant sharing her name with Buddhist officiants and also displaying similarities in her religious practices with the <i>mudang</i>. The <i>posal</i>’s religious identity, as I argue in this paper, threatens Musok and Buddhism. From the <i>posal</i>’s perspective, Musok and Buddhism are both institutional and thus have clearly outlined beliefs. Indeed, from this perspective, Musok is not less institutionalized than Buddhism. The analysis of the relationship between the <i>posal</i> and Musok and between the <i>posal</i> and Buddhism is based on data collected from <i>mudang</i> and Buddhist blogs and other websites. The discourse analysis will demonstrate the ambiguous boundaries of identities between the religious figures of the <i>mudang</i>, <i>posal</i> and Buddhists and how the <i>posal</i>’s lack of institutional identity and status cause the <i>mudang</i> and Buddhist to use their institutional authorities to curse the <i>posal</i> in two respects: spiritually and socially. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Korean Religions University of Hawai'I Press

The Posal between the Mudang and Buddhist: In-between and Bypassing

Journal of Korean Religions , Volume 4 (2) – Nov 28, 2013

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-hawai-i-press/the-posal-between-the-mudang-and-buddhist-in-between-and-bypassing-GymTDsAjL6
Publisher
University of Hawai'I Press
Copyright
Copyright © Institute for the Study of Religion, Sogang University, Korea
ISSN
2093-7288
eISSN
2167-2040

Abstract

Buddhism and Musok in Korea have been closely interrelated in many ways for a long time. Their affinities and similarities are acknowledged in terms of inclusiveness, inter-relationships and syncretism, while their differences are underlined by exclusiveness and specificities. In the classification of religions Musok is considered a popular religion, not an institutionalized religion like Buddhism. There has been little scholarly interest in the religious phenomenon that stands between Musok and Buddhism. This space is occupied by the hybrid religious figure of the <i>posal</i>. The <i>posal</i> is a religious officiant sharing her name with Buddhist officiants and also displaying similarities in her religious practices with the <i>mudang</i>. The <i>posal</i>’s religious identity, as I argue in this paper, threatens Musok and Buddhism. From the <i>posal</i>’s perspective, Musok and Buddhism are both institutional and thus have clearly outlined beliefs. Indeed, from this perspective, Musok is not less institutionalized than Buddhism. The analysis of the relationship between the <i>posal</i> and Musok and between the <i>posal</i> and Buddhism is based on data collected from <i>mudang</i> and Buddhist blogs and other websites. The discourse analysis will demonstrate the ambiguous boundaries of identities between the religious figures of the <i>mudang</i>, <i>posal</i> and Buddhists and how the <i>posal</i>’s lack of institutional identity and status cause the <i>mudang</i> and Buddhist to use their institutional authorities to curse the <i>posal</i> in two respects: spiritually and socially.

Journal

Journal of Korean ReligionsUniversity of Hawai'I Press

Published: Nov 28, 2013

There are no references for this article.