Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Response to John D'Arcy May's Review of Facing Up to Real Doctrinal Difference: How Some Thought-Motifs from Derrida Can Nourish the Catholic-Buddhist Encounter by Robert Magliola (review)

Response to John D'Arcy May's Review of Facing Up to Real Doctrinal Difference: How Some... BOOK REVIEWS to a number of texts from the two religious traditions. Similarly, the authors choose not to explore the differences between the Theravada and Mahāyāna schools of Buddhism, whose distinct understanding of Buddhahood will result in a different engagement of Christianity. Perhaps Haight and Knitter will choose to continue this conversation in the future and set out to explore the way in which both Buddhism and Christianity developed a plurality of schools of thought within the orbit of a broader religious tradition. Thomas Cattoi Jesuit School of Theology at Santa Clara University and Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, California RESPONSE TO JOHN D’ARCY MAY’S REVIEW OF FACING UP TO REAL DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCE: HOW SOME THOUGHT-MOTIFS FROM DERRIDA CAN NOURISH THE CATHOLIC-BUDDHIST ENCOUNTER. By Robert Magliola. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press, 2014. Intensely argued debate is most welcome in reviews, but misrepresentation of fact, such that a reviewed text is represented as saying X when it clearly says non-X, is unethical. I contend that the review in question misrepresents me in such a way. Thus John D’Arcy May’s review of my book, Facing Up to Real Doctrinal Difference: How Some Thought-Motifs from Derrida Can Nourish the Catholic-Buddhist Encounter (BCS 35 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Buddhist-Christian Studies University of Hawai'I Press

Response to John D'Arcy May's Review of Facing Up to Real Doctrinal Difference: How Some Thought-Motifs from Derrida Can Nourish the Catholic-Buddhist Encounter by Robert Magliola (review)

Buddhist-Christian Studies , Volume 37 – Oct 28, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-hawai-i-press/response-to-john-d-arcy-may-s-review-of-facing-up-to-real-doctrinal-zeVwB1Z2k0
Publisher
University of Hawai'I Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 The University of Hawai'i Press.
ISSN
1527-9472
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

BOOK REVIEWS to a number of texts from the two religious traditions. Similarly, the authors choose not to explore the differences between the Theravada and Mahāyāna schools of Buddhism, whose distinct understanding of Buddhahood will result in a different engagement of Christianity. Perhaps Haight and Knitter will choose to continue this conversation in the future and set out to explore the way in which both Buddhism and Christianity developed a plurality of schools of thought within the orbit of a broader religious tradition. Thomas Cattoi Jesuit School of Theology at Santa Clara University and Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, California RESPONSE TO JOHN D’ARCY MAY’S REVIEW OF FACING UP TO REAL DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCE: HOW SOME THOUGHT-MOTIFS FROM DERRIDA CAN NOURISH THE CATHOLIC-BUDDHIST ENCOUNTER. By Robert Magliola. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press, 2014. Intensely argued debate is most welcome in reviews, but misrepresentation of fact, such that a reviewed text is represented as saying X when it clearly says non-X, is unethical. I contend that the review in question misrepresents me in such a way. Thus John D’Arcy May’s review of my book, Facing Up to Real Doctrinal Difference: How Some Thought-Motifs from Derrida Can Nourish the Catholic-Buddhist Encounter (BCS 35

Journal

Buddhist-Christian StudiesUniversity of Hawai'I Press

Published: Oct 28, 2017

There are no references for this article.