Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
528 Reviews Mitra’s conclusion outlines the ways in which Dust (2014) dismantles ballet’s elitist association and contemporizes the form. A collaboration with the renowned ballerina Tamara Rojo, this piece began in “darkness to illumi- nate gradually with a spotlight at the center stage, a hunched over inhuman figure appears . . . the writhing body . . . is contracted, alienated in and by its own embodied trauma,” which is then “followed by a line of figures stepping into light. . . . The silence is broken with claps and releasing dust from their fists” (p. 163). This metaphor of dust is “a process of self-renewal and releas- ing old skin to allow a new life to emerge” (p. 164). Mitra suggests a feminist reading of Dust as Khan’s intervention to ballet (p. 165). Khan’s contribution to contemporary dance is significant; however, Mitra’s amplified claim is that Khan “altered” (p. 168) the landscape of global dance, which may deny past, contemporary, and future explorations by other artists across the globe. This book will be of high interest to those who seek a revised and alternate rethinking of interculturalism across South Asian dia- sporic performing arts. It throws light on
Asian Theatre Journal – University of Hawai'I Press
Published: Aug 9, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.