Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Nagarjuna and the Doctrine of "Skillful Means"

Nagarjuna and the Doctrine of "Skillful Means" Å Å xe qe txe exh ri hygsxi yp usvvpv wiex99 tohn hroeder tF wry9s gollege of wrylnd elthough numer of fuddhist sholrs hve exmined the dotrine of skillEinE Â mens99 @upyEkuslyA in whyn fuddhist litertureD it is surprising tht no one Å Å Å hs yet developed this importnt onept in reltion to xgrjunF qiven tht upy Å Å Å is entrl dotrine in the erly whyn textsD nd given tht xgrjun is Å Å Å Å entrl philosopher of this trditionD it is unfortunte tht sholrs py little ttention to how upy influened xgrjun9s thoughtF wihel ye9s kilful wens is the Å Å Å only signifint study of upy to dteD nd it notes how sholrs onsistently overE Å look its importneX xirv 9D odhisttv9D emptiness9 @ktF Â unyt A nd so on hve ll een onsidered in sÅ Ån Å Ç this wy nd thtD ut prt from osionl referenes nd rief definitions skilful mens9 hs srely een ttended to t llF e onept whih hs een used to explin the very existene of fuddhism s funtioning religious system demnds loser ttenE tionF @ye IWUVD pF PA his lk of ttention to upy ertinly pplies http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Philosophy East and West University of Hawai'I Press

Nagarjuna and the Doctrine of "Skillful Means"

Philosophy East and West , Volume 50 (4) – Jan 10, 2000

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-hawai-i-press/nagarjuna-and-the-doctrine-of-skillful-means-oZNtwi7h7H

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of Hawai'I Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 University of Hawai'i Press.
ISSN
1529-1898
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Å Å xe qe txe exh ri hygsxi yp usvvpv wiex99 tohn hroeder tF wry9s gollege of wrylnd elthough numer of fuddhist sholrs hve exmined the dotrine of skillEinE Â mens99 @upyEkuslyA in whyn fuddhist litertureD it is surprising tht no one Å Å Å hs yet developed this importnt onept in reltion to xgrjunF qiven tht upy Å Å Å is entrl dotrine in the erly whyn textsD nd given tht xgrjun is Å Å Å Å entrl philosopher of this trditionD it is unfortunte tht sholrs py little ttention to how upy influened xgrjun9s thoughtF wihel ye9s kilful wens is the Å Å Å only signifint study of upy to dteD nd it notes how sholrs onsistently overE Å look its importneX xirv 9D odhisttv9D emptiness9 @ktF Â unyt A nd so on hve ll een onsidered in sÅ Ån Å Ç this wy nd thtD ut prt from osionl referenes nd rief definitions skilful mens9 hs srely een ttended to t llF e onept whih hs een used to explin the very existene of fuddhism s funtioning religious system demnds loser ttenE tionF @ye IWUVD pF PA his lk of ttention to upy ertinly pplies

Journal

Philosophy East and WestUniversity of Hawai'I Press

Published: Jan 10, 2000

There are no references for this article.