Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Kritik der symbolischen Formen I: Symbolische Form und Funktion by Raji C. Steineck (review)

Kritik der symbolischen Formen I: Symbolische Form und Funktion by Raji C. Steineck (review) inward movement; we may compare this with the words of the Buddha recorded in the Anguttara Nikya: Volition is action, thus I say, O monks; for as soon as volition arises, one does the action" (Cross, p. 168). Reference Piantelli, M. 1986. "La My nelle Upanisad di Schopenhauer." Annuario Filosofico 2 (1986): 163­207. Kritik der symbolischen Formen I: Symbolische Form und Funktion (Critique of symbolic forms I: Symbolic forms and function). By Raji C. Steineck. Philosophie Interkulturell, Band 3. Stuttgart­Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2014. Pp. 148. Paper 38. isbn 978-3-7728-2673-3. Reviewed by Thora Ilin Bayer Xavier University of Louisiana tibayer@xula.edu For any reader with knowledge of the works of Ernst Cassirer, the question that will come to mind on approaching Raji C. Steineck's Kritik der symbolischen Formen I: Symbolische Form und Funktion is: Why Japan? Cassirer's great range of writings on the history of thought, culture, and symbol involves no sustained attention to Japanese culture. Cassirer also never addresses problems of East-West philosophy, nor did he, unlike some other German thinkers in the twentieth century, engage in correspondence with Japanese thinkers. In the first volume of Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Cassirer does make reference in several places to the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Philosophy East and West University of Hawai'I Press

Kritik der symbolischen Formen I: Symbolische Form und Funktion by Raji C. Steineck (review)

Philosophy East and West , Volume 66 (4) – Oct 13, 2016

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-hawai-i-press/kritik-der-symbolischen-formen-i-symbolische-form-und-funktion-by-raji-nWuTDf8FOf
Publisher
University of Hawai'I Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 University of Hawai'i Press.
ISSN
1529-1898
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

inward movement; we may compare this with the words of the Buddha recorded in the Anguttara Nikya: Volition is action, thus I say, O monks; for as soon as volition arises, one does the action" (Cross, p. 168). Reference Piantelli, M. 1986. "La My nelle Upanisad di Schopenhauer." Annuario Filosofico 2 (1986): 163­207. Kritik der symbolischen Formen I: Symbolische Form und Funktion (Critique of symbolic forms I: Symbolic forms and function). By Raji C. Steineck. Philosophie Interkulturell, Band 3. Stuttgart­Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2014. Pp. 148. Paper 38. isbn 978-3-7728-2673-3. Reviewed by Thora Ilin Bayer Xavier University of Louisiana tibayer@xula.edu For any reader with knowledge of the works of Ernst Cassirer, the question that will come to mind on approaching Raji C. Steineck's Kritik der symbolischen Formen I: Symbolische Form und Funktion is: Why Japan? Cassirer's great range of writings on the history of thought, culture, and symbol involves no sustained attention to Japanese culture. Cassirer also never addresses problems of East-West philosophy, nor did he, unlike some other German thinkers in the twentieth century, engage in correspondence with Japanese thinkers. In the first volume of Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Cassirer does make reference in several places to the

Journal

Philosophy East and WestUniversity of Hawai'I Press

Published: Oct 13, 2016

There are no references for this article.