Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
One of the issues with which I have struggled in interfaith work and within Buddhist-Christian studies over the years is the common, but often unspoken, practice of engaging the dialogue from a position of recognizing strengths in the other tradition. I am occasionally invited to speak at Mother's Trust/Mother's Place, an interfaith community in western Michigan. It is a vibrant intentional community, rooted in an offshoot of the Vivekananda tradition and located about an hour's drive from Kalamazoo, where I teach. They offer courses on interfaith work and have an active and varied list of speakers throughout the year, ranging from indigenous native traditions of Michigan to Buddhist, Sufi, Hindu--and, of course, Christian. The resident members of this community are grounded in the meditation practices of the Ramakrishna lineage but wrestle with the very real challenges of how to live a life of integrity that honors and respects the truths of all faith traditions. When I have spoken at services on Sunday morning, I speak out of the Pli tradition, the Buddhist tradition with which I have identified, studied, and argued for the better part of three decades. The first talks that I gave in the late 1990s
Buddhist-Christian Studies – University of Hawai'I Press
Published: Oct 10, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.