Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Commentary: Widening the Lens and Rethinking Asian American History

Commentary: Widening the Lens and Rethinking Asian American History The new research here reported is extending Asian American and American history into the Pacific, complementing recent Atlantic world studies. Such extension fundamentally challenges the dominant east-west movement of American history. These essays offer (or reveal the need for) greater conceptual clarity in defining terms in the field and the scope of the field's international dimensions. This new work highlights the importance of including a comparative aspect of transnational and global approaches to American history. While Pacific-wide or global developments may share a common history, there are also very specific local histories that demand distinction and invite comparison. Collectively, the essays gathered together suggest a more capacious definition of the field. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Pacific Historical Review University of California Press

Commentary: Widening the Lens and Rethinking Asian American History

Pacific Historical Review , Volume 76 (4) – Nov 1, 2007

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-california-press/commentary-widening-the-lens-and-rethinking-asian-american-history-YieaKBDqmV

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of California Press
Copyright
Copyright © by the University of California Press
ISSN
0030-8684
eISSN
1533-8584
DOI
10.1525/phr.2007.76.4.605
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The new research here reported is extending Asian American and American history into the Pacific, complementing recent Atlantic world studies. Such extension fundamentally challenges the dominant east-west movement of American history. These essays offer (or reveal the need for) greater conceptual clarity in defining terms in the field and the scope of the field's international dimensions. This new work highlights the importance of including a comparative aspect of transnational and global approaches to American history. While Pacific-wide or global developments may share a common history, there are also very specific local histories that demand distinction and invite comparison. Collectively, the essays gathered together suggest a more capacious definition of the field.

Journal

Pacific Historical ReviewUniversity of California Press

Published: Nov 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.