“Whoa! It's like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

Trying for life on Mars, again - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences

NASA's Spirit lander is scheduled to touch down just before midnight tomorrow (Jan. 3) on Mars' Gusev Crater. It will find itself in a 200 kilometer-long depression that could have been an ancient lakebed. If indeed there was once water there, there is a very good chance of finding evidence of ancient microbial life in the dust and rocks around Gusev. But Spirit will encounter boulders, chasms and unknown geological obstacles. That's because this time the agency let the scientists choose the landing site, rather than the mission engineers. “They've taken a much riskier option for a landing site, which means that the chances for failure are much higher,” said Christopher Chyba, a Stanford astrobiologist. “And that's exactly what they should be doing.” When the Viking landers touched Martian regolith for the first time in 1976, the sites were chosen primarily for safety reasons. Telescopes showed the regions to be large featureless plains filled with sand-like dust and not too many rocks to damage the landers. The reasons for such care are obvious to the minders of the Beagle II, which landed on December 25, but has since been silent—probably due to a landing-related accident. At the heart http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Scientist The Scientist

Trying for life on Mars, again - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences

Abstract

NASA's Spirit lander is scheduled to touch down just before midnight tomorrow (Jan. 3) on Mars' Gusev Crater. It will find itself in a 200 kilometer-long depression that could have been an ancient lakebed. If indeed there was once water there, there is a very good chance of finding evidence of ancient microbial life in the dust and rocks around Gusev. But Spirit will encounter boulders, chasms and unknown geological obstacles. That's because this time the agency let the scientists choose the landing site, rather than the mission engineers. “They've taken a much riskier option for a landing site, which means that the chances for failure are much higher,” said Christopher Chyba, a Stanford astrobiologist. “And that's exactly what they should be doing.” When the Viking landers touched Martian regolith for the first time in 1976, the sites were chosen primarily for safety reasons. Telescopes showed the regions to be large featureless plains filled with sand-like dust and not too many rocks to damage the landers. The reasons for such care are obvious to the minders of the Beagle II, which landed on December 25, but has since been silent—probably due to a landing-related accident. At the heart
Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/the-scientist/trying-for-life-on-mars-again-the-scientist-magazine-of-the-life-bWrHRzc8oj

Sorry, we don't have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now: