Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Fears Of Congressional Revision Cloud Clinton Budget Prospects - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences

Fears Of Congressional Revision Cloud Clinton Budget Prospects - The Scientist - Magazine of the... Policy-watchers wonder if even modest increases for science will survive Republican lawmakers' fiscal conservatism The Clinton administration is striving to put the best possible "spin" on its $72.9 billion research and development budget for the 1996 fiscal year, which would provide modest increases--about enough to keep pace with inflation--for the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. White House science adviser John H. Gibbons contends that "science and technology are maintained as a priority investment in the administration's FY96 budget submission, with total R&D funding increasing slightly, despite overall cuts in discretionary spending." At the same time, however, science community observers and other Washington-based science policy-watchers say the administration's R&D budget faces highly uncertain prospects on Capitol Hill. With fiscally minded Republicans now in control of both the House and Senate, the final 1996 budget may bear little resemblance to the president's submission. Cornelius J. Pings, president of the Association of American Universities (AAU), representing about 50 major United States research universities, calls the administration's budget "a very strong submission ... and a reaffirmation of their commitment, that they see [R&D] as an area of investment. My concern now is to sustain that position with the http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Scientist The Scientist

Fears Of Congressional Revision Cloud Clinton Budget Prospects - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences

The Scientist , Volume 9 (5): 1 – Mar 6, 1995

Fears Of Congressional Revision Cloud Clinton Budget Prospects - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences

The Scientist , Volume 9 (5): 1 – Mar 6, 1995

Abstract

Policy-watchers wonder if even modest increases for science will survive Republican lawmakers' fiscal conservatism The Clinton administration is striving to put the best possible "spin" on its $72.9 billion research and development budget for the 1996 fiscal year, which would provide modest increases--about enough to keep pace with inflation--for the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. White House science adviser John H. Gibbons contends that "science and technology are maintained as a priority investment in the administration's FY96 budget submission, with total R&D funding increasing slightly, despite overall cuts in discretionary spending." At the same time, however, science community observers and other Washington-based science policy-watchers say the administration's R&D budget faces highly uncertain prospects on Capitol Hill. With fiscally minded Republicans now in control of both the House and Senate, the final 1996 budget may bear little resemblance to the president's submission. Cornelius J. Pings, president of the Association of American Universities (AAU), representing about 50 major United States research universities, calls the administration's budget "a very strong submission ... and a reaffirmation of their commitment, that they see [R&D] as an area of investment. My concern now is to sustain that position with the

Loading next page...
 
/lp/the-scientist/fears-of-congressional-revision-cloud-clinton-budget-prospects-the-f2zr1t0CR0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
The Scientist
Copyright
© 1986-2010 The Scientist
ISSN
1759-796X
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Policy-watchers wonder if even modest increases for science will survive Republican lawmakers' fiscal conservatism The Clinton administration is striving to put the best possible "spin" on its $72.9 billion research and development budget for the 1996 fiscal year, which would provide modest increases--about enough to keep pace with inflation--for the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. White House science adviser John H. Gibbons contends that "science and technology are maintained as a priority investment in the administration's FY96 budget submission, with total R&D funding increasing slightly, despite overall cuts in discretionary spending." At the same time, however, science community observers and other Washington-based science policy-watchers say the administration's R&D budget faces highly uncertain prospects on Capitol Hill. With fiscally minded Republicans now in control of both the House and Senate, the final 1996 budget may bear little resemblance to the president's submission. Cornelius J. Pings, president of the Association of American Universities (AAU), representing about 50 major United States research universities, calls the administration's budget "a very strong submission ... and a reaffirmation of their commitment, that they see [R&D] as an area of investment. My concern now is to sustain that position with the

Journal

The ScientistThe Scientist

Published: Mar 6, 1995

There are no references for this article.