Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The hot but not the cold minimal model allows precise assessment of insulin sensitivity in NIDDM subjects

The hot but not the cold minimal model allows precise assessment of insulin sensitivity in NIDDM... Avogaro, Angelo, Paolo Vicini, Anna Valerio, Andrea Caumo, and Claudio Cobelli. The hot but not the cold allows precise assessment of insulin sensitivity subjects. Am. J. Physiol. 270 (Endocrinol. Metab. 33): E532-E540, 1996.-Assessment of insulin sensitivity in subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is of paramount importance but intrinsically difficult. The standard (hereafter cold) , in conjunction with an insulin-modified protocol, has been recently proposed, but the estimates of insulin sensitivity showed poor precision (Saad et al. Diabetes 43: 1114-1121, 1994). We propose the tracer (hereafter hot) as a highly reliable method to estimate insulin sensitivity (Sa and fractional glucose clearance (SE), reflecting glucose disposal only, subjects. A [6,6-2H2]glucose-labeled insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test was performed in seven NIDDM subjects. In particular, Sfwas 1.07 t 0.34 X 10V4 minl=uU1.ml estimated with an average precision (mean coefficient of variation of 12%, range 4-22%), whereas the cold SI was 0.96 t 0.26 X lop4 min+ $Y*rnl (mean coefficient of variation of 105%, range 3-353%). Another advantage of the hot indexes with respect to the cold indexes is their ability to reflect glucose and insulin effect on glucose disposal only, and not also on hepatic glucose production. Finally, we also studied http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png AJP - Endocrinology and Metabolism The American Physiological Society

The hot but not the cold minimal model allows precise assessment of insulin sensitivity in NIDDM subjects

Loading next page...
 
/lp/the-american-physiological-society/the-hot-but-not-the-cold-minimal-model-allows-precise-assessment-of-cVcXGE3eUz

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
The American Physiological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 the American Physiological Society
ISSN
0193-1849
eISSN
1522-1555
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Avogaro, Angelo, Paolo Vicini, Anna Valerio, Andrea Caumo, and Claudio Cobelli. The hot but not the cold allows precise assessment of insulin sensitivity subjects. Am. J. Physiol. 270 (Endocrinol. Metab. 33): E532-E540, 1996.-Assessment of insulin sensitivity in subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is of paramount importance but intrinsically difficult. The standard (hereafter cold) , in conjunction with an insulin-modified protocol, has been recently proposed, but the estimates of insulin sensitivity showed poor precision (Saad et al. Diabetes 43: 1114-1121, 1994). We propose the tracer (hereafter hot) as a highly reliable method to estimate insulin sensitivity (Sa and fractional glucose clearance (SE), reflecting glucose disposal only, subjects. A [6,6-2H2]glucose-labeled insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test was performed in seven NIDDM subjects. In particular, Sfwas 1.07 t 0.34 X 10V4 minl=uU1.ml estimated with an average precision (mean coefficient of variation of 12%, range 4-22%), whereas the cold SI was 0.96 t 0.26 X lop4 min+ $Y*rnl (mean coefficient of variation of 105%, range 3-353%). Another advantage of the hot indexes with respect to the cold indexes is their ability to reflect glucose and insulin effect on glucose disposal only, and not also on hepatic glucose production. Finally, we also studied

Journal

AJP - Endocrinology and MetabolismThe American Physiological Society

Published: Mar 1, 1996

There are no references for this article.