Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Mechanics of Breathing in Relation to Manual Methods of Artificial Respiration

Mechanics of Breathing in Relation to Manual Methods of Artificial Respiration W. T. GOODALE Harvard Boston, , AND S. J. SARNOFF. From School of Public Massachusetts Health, J. E. AFFELDT, the Department of Physiology, and the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, EAWAKENG OF TEREST manual methods of has led to critical examation of several candidate methods under a variety of experimental conditions. The most extensive observations have been made by Gordon and his associates on warm corpses (I) and on curarized normal human subjects (2). It was suggested by these and other studies (3) that alternative procedures might be superior to the Schafer ‘prone-pressure’ method, which has been most widely taught the United States. From the physiologic pot of view, the problem of manual presented 4 prcipal phases: I) the ventilatory effectiveness of the manual techniques relation to the range of attributes of the thorax and lungs, health and disease; z) the effectiveness of a given amount of ventilation accomplishg gas exchange; 3) the optimal timg of the component fractions of each sequence of motions; and 4) the circulatory effects of the different procedures. concurrent and tegrated studies by 4 groups of vestigators, these phases were given various amounts of attention. Collection of the data this report was started with http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Physiology The American Physiological Society

Mechanics of Breathing in Relation to Manual Methods of Artificial Respiration

Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/the-american-physiological-society/mechanics-of-breathing-in-relation-to-manual-methods-of-artificial-kDn0RMLpBh

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
The American Physiological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 1951 the American Physiological Society
ISSN
8750-7587
eISSN
1522-1601
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

W. T. GOODALE Harvard Boston, , AND S. J. SARNOFF. From School of Public Massachusetts Health, J. E. AFFELDT, the Department of Physiology, and the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, EAWAKENG OF TEREST manual methods of has led to critical examation of several candidate methods under a variety of experimental conditions. The most extensive observations have been made by Gordon and his associates on warm corpses (I) and on curarized normal human subjects (2). It was suggested by these and other studies (3) that alternative procedures might be superior to the Schafer ‘prone-pressure’ method, which has been most widely taught the United States. From the physiologic pot of view, the problem of manual presented 4 prcipal phases: I) the ventilatory effectiveness of the manual techniques relation to the range of attributes of the thorax and lungs, health and disease; z) the effectiveness of a given amount of ventilation accomplishg gas exchange; 3) the optimal timg of the component fractions of each sequence of motions; and 4) the circulatory effects of the different procedures. concurrent and tegrated studies by 4 groups of vestigators, these phases were given various amounts of attention. Collection of the data this report was started with

Journal

Journal of Applied Physiology – The American Physiological Society

Published: Dec 1, 1951

There are no references for this article.