Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Netzer (1978)
The Subsidized Muse: Public Support for the Arts in the United States
(1992)
The structure and politics of local support for the arts in the United States. In Decentralization, regionalisation et action culturelle municipale
Kevin Mulcahy, Margaret Wyszomirski (1995)
America's Commitment To Culture: Government And The Arts
Jeffrey Love (1991)
Sorting Out Our Roles: The State Arts Agencies and the National Endowment for the ArtsJournal of Arts Management and Law, 21
D. Dworkin (1991)
State Advocacy in the Arts: A Historical OverviewJournal of Arts Management and Law, 21
V. Alexander, J. Balfe (1995)
Paying the piper : causes and consequences of art patronageContemporary Sociology, 24
John Urice (1992)
The Future of the State Arts Agency Movement in the 1990s: Decline and EffectJournal of Arts Management Law and Society, 22
(1982)
States and local arts agencies
(1964)
Annual repon of the National Endowment for the Arts and National Council for the Arts
The State Arts Agency: An Overview of Cultural Federalism in the United States KEVIN V. MULCAHY his article is a brief summary of the history of state arts councils (SAAs) T in the United States. Although the fifty-six agencies with that title include ones in the six special jurisdictions of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and Northern Marianas, the SAA designation is conventional. I organize the discussion into five sections: ( 1) historical background; (2) organizational structure; (3) budget data; (4) intergovernmental relations; and (5) the future of public culture. My overall finding is that the revision in the relative resources of agencies at the nation- al and subnational levels of government for funding the arts requires a recon- figuration of policymaking roles and responsibilities. In particular, the pro- grammatic elements of a national cultural policy need to be assumed largely at the subnational levels of government. The decline of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is lamentable, but seemingly irreversible. If there is to be a future for public culture in the United States, a post-NEA pol- icymaking paradigm must be constructed. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND It is a truism of political
"The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society" – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.